Was it not really Maynard's fault?

[LeftPeg_Pie]

Did anyone on this site actually watch some of the crap played under his leadership ? Judging by some of the comments NO..

I do not see many people saying we were consistently brilliant under Maynard. I think most people would say we underperformed too often.

The argument is just more nuanced than Maynard was terrible. Obviously.

[durhampie]

I do not see many people saying we were consistently brilliant under Maynard. I think most people would say we underperformed too often.

The argument is just more nuanced than Maynard was terrible. Obviously.

Anyone of us on this board could have stood in his place on the touchline and got the same results, in some case better. Regardless of the player situation, he was absolutely clueless and thats being kind.. he was totally out of his depth, and never looked like getting any better..

[caj85]

Anyone of us on this board could have stood in his place on the touchline and got the same results, in some case better. Regardless of the player situation, he was absolutely clueless and thats being kind.. he was totally out of his depth, and never looked like getting any better..

I agree he wasn't great and didn't get the best out of the squad he had, but no chance "anyone of us here" could have done better or even the same.