+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 177 of 309 FirstFirst ... 77127167175176177178179187227277 ... LastLast
Results 1,761 to 1,770 of 3087

Thread: Political Thread in memory of David Reid. (R.I.P.)

  1. #1761
    A thankyou to a US based poster...

    I WATCHED THE ENTIRE MILITARY PARADE SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO
    Here's what it was like...
    • The initial forecast was for 200,000 spectators, though it appeared less than half of that turned out. Estimates ranged from 50,000-100,000—half of the estimated turnout for the "NO KINGS" protest in L.A. alone (early estimates report 5+ million nationwide).
    • The parade itself was actually kind of embarrassing. Even though none of us wanted the U.S. to engage in the kind of authoritarian shows of force Russia, China, and N. Korea are fond of putting on, we've all seen video of those parades—even when they have those huge, goofy strides like their entire military is auditioning for the Ministry of Silly Walks—with tens of thousands of soldiers marching in lockstep precision, it's still SUPER IMPRESSIVE how in sync they all are.
    We didn't do anything cool like that.
    For the most part, our boys were BARELY synced up to "Left—Left—Left, Right, Left." And don't even try to tell me that that's because our troops are too focused on lethality and warfighting these days to waste time honing their precision goosestepping because we had like 14 marching bands and probably 5 times as many flutes and tubas as Apaches and tanks.
    Rather than the Mighty Show Of Military Might Trump was obviously going for, the whole thing came off like the kind of cheesy parade you'd see at Disney World — various regiments in period pieces spanning the ages from the Revolutionary War down through....the L.A. protests, I guess. An emcee over the loudspeaker read off a clunkily-worded "bio/history" for each group that walked past, and the whole thing felt like being on the people-mover winding through Tomorrowland (I haven't been to Disney World since '99, so shut up if that's not a ride anymore).
    • There were at least 4 fly-bys of various aircraft—plus a jump from the Golden Knights parachute team—but it was so overcast that you could barely see anything. I assume it would've looked cool if the whole event hadn't made God cry.
    • There were some pretty sweet tanks and vehicles, but they were so sparse and spread out that they seemed like more of an afterthought than the Big Stupid Expensive Thing everyone kept imagining this was gonna be.
    Some of the vehicles though....I have no idea why someone thought it would be a good idea to put these in a Military Might parade. I get that they were trying to showcase vehicles from different eras, but maybe be a bit more judicious with WHICH vehicles get to do a solo? I mean, a few dozen 1940s Jeeps all in formation would probably look SWEET. You know what doesn't though? ONE JEEP driving down the street all by itself. One of the vehicles they showcased didn't even have a windshield. I turned to my wife and said, "The hell is that, a RIDING MOWER?"
    • The soundtrack for the whole thing was Cringe on steroids: Metallica, Van Halen, AC/DC—a bunch of rockin' tunes that usually get a crowd fired up, only they didn't use the actual songs. Since none of those bands would approve their music being used for such a spectacle, the Army apparently recorded their own versions of the songs without any vocals, which was like listening to karaoke tracks. (Van Halen's "Right Now" is WAY up on my all-time-favs list, but without Sammy Hagar, the song loses all its punch.)
    • The MOST CRINGE aspect of the whole thing was that each section of the parade had corporate sponsors and the emcee kept reading them off like a sports play-by-play announcer who has to keep reminding the folks at home that "This field goal attempt is brought to you by Jimmy John's Subs. Jimmy John's—always Freaky Fast!"
    But apparently they couldn't find all that many corporate sponsors who wanted to be a part of this. The 5 sponsors I counted were—I sh*t you not—Lockheed Martin, Coinbase, UFC, Scott's Miracle Grow, and...f****** PALANTIR!
    In summary, the entire thing came off like amateur hour. You can tell America doesn't do these very often (the last one was in '91 to celebrate the end of the Persian Gulf War, and before that was the end of WW2), and maybe that's for good reason. This didn't even come across like a dress rehearsal. This came across like the Army was like, "We're gonna do a parade—who wants to be in it? Meet us out on the street tomorrow afternoon so we can get a headcount of everyone—PLEASE BE SURE TO BRING YOUR TUBAS IF YOU'VE GOT ONE—and then we'll sit down and diagram the whole thing on paper before we start rehearsing," but then everyone showed up the next afternoon and the Army was like F*** rehearsal, we're doing this thing NOW!!!! Everyone, START MARCHING(ish)!"
    No part of this pitiful disaster was a show of American Military Might. It was a cry for help and an indictment against kicking gays out of the military - exactly the kind of parade you’d expected when you fired the only people who know how to throw a proper parade.
    So, in the end...Trump got exactly the kind of birthday he deserved.

  2. #1762

  3. #1763
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,024
    Israel is doing the Yanks a favour actually, they get to try out their brand new all-singing, all-dancing THAAD missile defence system for real, without having to start a war to do it. But that's what friends are for isn't it.

  4. #1764
    The American War Machine seems to be ramping up supplies and weapons. Trump's Mad Dog rhetoric suggests he is going to bomb the pfhuck out of Tehran.

    USAF Bomb Busters hitting the underground storage sites seems pretty much inevitable.

    Will he declare the US are at war with Iran?

    Will slimeball Starmer support him?

    Will the UN belatedly find WMD?

    Netanyahu gets what he wants after all.

  5. #1765
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,024
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    The American War Machine seems to be ramping up supplies and weapons. Trump's Mad Dog rhetoric suggests he is going to bomb the pfhuck out of Tehran.

    USAF Bomb Busters hitting the underground storage sites seems pretty much inevitable.

    Will he declare the US are at war with Iran?

    Will slimeball Starmer support him?

    Will the UN belatedly find WMD?

    Netanyahu gets what he wants after all.
    The Supreme Leader holed up in a bunker, awaiting his fate, traffic jams in Tehran as they try to get out as quickly as possible, Iranian air defence systems destroyed giving the IAF the freedom of the skies to bomb as, when and where they choose. The only option left open to Iran is to lob some of their rapidly reducing stockpile of missiles in the general direction of Israel and hope they get lucky.

    Amazingly there are still some media outlets reporting on this conflict as though the outcome is still in the balance, the Grauniad, Al Jazeera and the BBC for instance, can't bring themselves to recognise the reality of the situation, it's as good as over, Israel has won, again.

  6. #1766
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,024
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    The American War Machine seems to be ramping up supplies and weapons. Trump's Mad Dog rhetoric suggests he is going to bomb the pfhuck out of Tehran.

    USAF Bomb Busters hitting the underground storage sites seems pretty much inevitable.

    Will he declare the US are at war with Iran?

    Will slimeball Starmer support him?

    Will the UN belatedly find WMD?

    Netanyahu gets what he wants after all.
    The Supreme Leader holed up in a bunker, awaiting his fate, traffic jams in Tehran as they try to get out as quickly as possible, Iranian air defence systems destroyed giving the IAF the freedom of the skies to bomb as, when and where they choose. The only option left open to Iran is to lob some of their rapidly reducing stockpile of missiles in the general direction of Israel and hope they get lucky.

    Amazingly there are still some media outlets reporting on this conflict as though the outcome is still in the balance, the Grauniad, Al Jazeera and the BBC for instance, can't bring themselves to recognise the reality of the situation, it's as good as over, Israel has won, again.

  7. #1767
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    4,907
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    The Supreme Leader holed up in a bunker, awaiting his fate, traffic jams in Tehran as they try to get out as quickly as possible, Iranian air defence systems destroyed giving the IAF the freedom of the skies to bomb as, when and where they choose. The only option left open to Iran is to lob some of their rapidly reducing stockpile of missiles in the general direction of Israel and hope they get lucky.

    Amazingly there are still some media outlets reporting on this conflict as though the outcome is still in the balance, the Grauniad, Al Jazeera and the BBC for instance, can't bring themselves to recognise the reality of the situation, it's as good as over, Israel has won, again.
    Sometimes conflicts are necessary and there are victors in war of course and the vanquished. I am however rarely convinced there are winners but certainly there are many many losers. If the theocratic government in Tehran should fall I will welcome it as will many Iranians who have had to live under their repressive rule. Starmer should stay well out of it. He can’t even defend the UK.

  8. #1768
    I've never been entirely sure why we call Israel an "Ally"

    From the NYT: "Fears of a wider war are growing after President Trump called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender,” cited the possibility of killing its supreme leader and referred to Israel’s war efforts with the word “we” — all apparent suggestions that the U.S. could enter the conflict, as Israel has pressed it to do."

    So Trump is saying it's OKAY for the Jews to bomb the pfhuck out of Iran but they must not retaliate? Good luck with that Senor Orange Buffoon.

  9. #1769
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,024
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    I've never been entirely sure why we call Israel an "Ally"

    From the NYT: "Fears of a wider war are growing after President Trump called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender,” cited the possibility of killing its supreme leader and referred to Israel’s war efforts with the word “we” — all apparent suggestions that the U.S. could enter the conflict, as Israel has pressed it to do."

    So Trump is saying it's OKAY for the Jews to bomb the pfhuck out of Iran but they must not retaliate? Good luck with that Senor Orange Buffoon.
    Mr Trump is politely requesting that Iran sticks to military targets, as Israel is doing, instead of indiscriminately targeting civilian areas. He's wasting his time, to Jihadists civilians are simply collateral damage.

  10. #1770
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,024
    This nonsense is what passes for political analysis in the Grauniad.


    Analysis

    "Israeli strikes have not knocked out Iran’s nuclear programme - or its nuclear ambitions"

    Emma Graham-Harrison in Jerusalem.

    "Damage done since Friday could be rebuilt within months, and the attacks are likely to fuel both government and popular desire for a nuclear deterrent"


    Jesus wept, it's not possible to find a more deluded person than Python's Black Knight, but Emma runs him close.

Page 177 of 309 FirstFirst ... 77127167175176177178179187227277 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. David Clowes Support Thread
    By Andy_Faber in forum The Ram Inn
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-11-2023, 06:29 PM
  2. R.I.P. CN58 - AKA BennieBoy David G Reid
    By gaz1959 in forum England Football Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29-09-2021, 11:09 AM
  3. O/T:- A well overdue political flame war thread
    By upthemaggies in forum Views from the Kop
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-08-2020, 11:59 AM
  4. O/T:- Should he stay or should he go? WARNING - POLITICAL THREAD!!!!
    By magpie_mania in forum Views from the Kop
    Replies: 523
    Last Post: 09-06-2020, 09:40 AM

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •