|
| + Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Hmmm…evasive as ever when challenged I see.
1) I imagine we all do…and your point is?
2) Again I imagine we all do.
3) I answered your question. Responded with another. You couldn’t/wouldn’t answer.
Regarding your final sentence, I’d love you to substantiate that. I’d suggest I’m at least as well read/researched as you despite the high opinion you appear to hold of yourself.
That rather depends upon what you consider a reasoned response! The personal criticism has generally been when either you or GP has made some petty observation to a post of mine, rather than providing an objective response. Why are you surprised when such a response gets a sharp retort?
In any case, your usual modus operandi is to selectively reply and then disappear when that's comprehensively shown to be total *******s! I mean there is only so much tosh obviously regurgitated from dubious sources that one can read before assuming that there the person doing that has a clear lack of cognitive ability.
I have tried to a ask a question in a polite way and received no response, as has RA, equally frustrating.
Seriously? It’s what you do, Andy. You put people on the spot to ask very direct questions, usually saying something like ‘genuine question, not a trap’…and there’s nothing wrong with that, but you never answer when the same is returned to you. Swale is right, it is frustrating…and oddly evasive.
Last edited by ramAnag; 31-08-2025 at 06:36 PM.
I am but RA generally doesn't which rather proves my point that your disappearance is generally due to you not willing to justify your point of view. Which goes back a long way and is rather childish, if your unwilling to debate then don't, fair enough, but throwing casual or provocative comments in and then not responding after that is pointless.
You claim that you can't be bothered to debate with those with blinkered views, yet both RA and myself, have a wide range of views, indeed on multiple occasions I have actually agreed with some of the points you have made and said so.
But when your response to the majority of people in the UK aren't fixated on immigration, you quote the fact that opinion polls suggest otherwise. Which is fine, but as you must surely know, it rather depends upon the question asked. I suspect most people if asked, Are you concerned about immigration? May answer yes. If they were asked which are you most concerned about? The economy, The NHS, Education, Public Transport, Climate change, Immigration, then the answers would be different, yet would still need to be taken with caution.
Now now RA, you know AF, considers himself a person who objectively looks at issues and provides informed, unbiased Comment, despite occasions when the masks slips and he complains about the "number of ethnic minorities in the media" not reflecting HIS world, or that Starmer's misspeak over "An island of strangers" was something that chimed with him (despite the obvious contradiction with his previous comment) Or that some of Trumps bullying is "good" especially on DEI, Government efficiency ( though he then failed to explain what he meant by that).
Apparently now he won't respond because he finds the references to Nazi Germany and other such comments tiresome, which I'm sure they re and precisely what many Germans said when they voted enthusiastically for a certain Her Hitler, with his flag waving, promises to fix a "broken Germany" and targeting of the Jews as the cause of all Germany's ills.
Still nothing to see here in the UK, its not as if flags, removing human rights, the false demonization and targeting of a sector of the population is going on is it. Nor is there any evidence of groups of thugs going around the country either, so nothing to worry about.