Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
we also need to be truthful.
...which is fine, but when (14/9) I fact checked and offered independant correction of what I believe was an innocently posted falsehood from MA, you were right across it, pushing back with 'MA may or not be correct...I don't know either (and neither) do you'. Yes I did, based on then-current (and still current) knowledge. That's you in denial (I can't think of a better word) about a thoroughly fact-checked (using independant sources), politely put and referenced correction, my assumption I'm afraid being because the original fitted your 'leaning'. Note that MA appeared to take it in good part. You appear to react the same with most facts and anecdotes that don't support your view.

Not sure how I can say the above 'nicely' but I hope its fairly polite