Quote Originally Posted by mygiddypant View Post
I'm not sure what the point of all that was.

You seem to be inferring that I'm avoiding acknowledging the role of Pakistani gangs in this matter. Not at all.

I am accusing you, and others, of concentrating solely on that particular ethnic group. I have repeatedly pointed out that ***ual abuse is predominantly an event that happens in a context familiar to the abused. This is mainly the home, but could also be school or church.

The right-wing doesn't acknowledge that ***ual abuse covers all ethnic groups. Indeed it was found that something like 40% of men arrested at recent protests over immigrant housing had a record of marital abuse.
If you really think that I am capable of that then you are as daft as a ****ing brush!

I put in the post on the thread that you were opposed to that although there were other offenders. You did not seem to read that bit!

My argument has always been and will be that all of the reports have ignored that the possibility of the perpetrators have been Pakistani! The Casey report has highlighted this fact and had caused the Labour government to commission a national inquiry prove whether it is true or not. The amount of arrests and convictions suggest that it is correct.

To be honest with you Giddy this info is available but isn’t easy to find. To accept it as a bloke from one of the towns involved in the scandal means that you could have missed something that could have helped one of the girls!

You could not but you probably know someone effected!