Quote Originally Posted by On Balance View Post
Hi Bomber,

Could we just pause and rewind for a moment. Bomber I have no issue with you. We disagreed on a thread which Baggieal initiated regarding Boingy, (Who I have never met and not is a friend of mine, he is simply another poster on a forum) to which I responded directly to Al saying what he wrote was uncalled for.

I would be grateful if you could point to which post you are referring to which you did not like. I can only think you refer to the thread I mention above, where Al posted that Boingy had fallen out with another on the new site, and posted only part of that thread on this site. What I disliked with the initial post was that Al, for whatever reason, posted only a single sentence of the post from the other site, which failed to provide a true reflection of the whole thread. Boingy and the other poster did not fall out. Indeed it was quite the opposite.

I believe Al was wrong to post the comments as he did. It was a fake assessment of the situation and I simply said it was uncalled for. Al responded and you followed in support of him on the Mason thread of the 19/09/25.

In one of your responses on that thread, you made three points and in my response to those three points, I responded and answered them all. In none of those posts on that thread did I use inappropriate language or make any inappropriate comments about yourself or other posters. Unfortunately that cannot be said of others, as I have been called vile and disgusting names on here and had untruthful reference made about my ***uality and my professionalism in the workplace.

In your thread of the 22/09/25, the one headed “Its goodbye from me,” let us be honest, you did get a little personal and ended by making a comment with regard to a misspelling I had made on a previous thread. I consider that reference inappropriate given the circumstances under which Soulman decided to stop posting only a few days earlier, when Baggieblood had made similar comments regarding Soulmans posts. I, along with others on here, made reference to Bloods comments as I have done so when another poster made disgusting comments aimed at Leicester. I will give Blood some credit, he did apologise. I did respond to your post and wrote “Not the most mature response Bomber.” I made it quite clear in the post I was referring to the Soulman situation and that my response was not about you personally, it was simply about the content of your post.

I will end by going back to where I started, and I understand you have stated above, it is your one and only response. However, in the interest of fairness, I would be grateful if you would highlight any post where I have been disrespectful to you, used inappropriate language or made statements regarding your personal life etc. If you do, I will apologise unreservedly and I would stop posting on the prediction league. If you are unable or do not wish to respond, then I accept that. In either case I would hope you do read this post and accept it in the spirit it is intended, reflect on its content and understand it is a genuine effort to clear up and clarify any misunderstandings. In either case, I would hope we could at least consider rewinding back to before the Baggial’s initial post and draw a line under it.

You twist everything to your narrative. This actually started by Bomber taking offence because Boingy started it by making a disgusting comment about a person must be on drugs if they didn?t see what he did against Bournemouth when we were simply outplayed. Bomber then quite rightly made a point of saying the rose tinted specs had started on the other forum. He was right. Not in any bad way but clearly Steve who i know in person disagrees with must footballing comments made by Boingy. Like me - Steve spends money by going to the matches, Your comments to Bomber were uncalled for and he quite rightly banned you. Consider this Bomber puts in a lot of work on those match predictions so even the slightest uncalled for comment would niggle him as it would anyone else doing that job for the benefit of the board.

You twisted the information about Mick. You clearly did some background work to find his company on Companies House and made a comment that his company was not doing as well as he made out. You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!

You have always had an agenda OB to cause trouble and you think your clever but take it from me - your not! Your tedious match prediction scores have bored most posters and this has been a complete p iss take of Bombers work!