Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post
Indeed RA, but then I guess that depends upon whether one holds the view that a paper which regularly publishes inaccurate, misleading views is being a touch hypocritical when attacking the BBC or if your more concerned with nit picking on details and ignoring the basic premise?

Of course if said person has a track record of being pedantic and ignoring the main issue, then its quite easy to reach a conclusion.
This seems to be a bit of a non sequitur. I wasn’t commenting on either the Telegraph or GP’s defence of it. I was just attempting to provide clarification over the four publications MA raised awareness of yesterday.