Quote Originally Posted by Oranje White View Post
@ WTF. You asked "what fabricated lie" are your heroes in the BBC guilty of and then call it a "clumsy edit "!!!! LOL. It was a calculated and blatant lie of an edit that you useful idiots ran with. I hope Trump does decide to sue the BBC for $1 billion and wipe those corrupt lying commies out. Why can't you admit you were fooled? You are aware the two high ranking BBC scum resigned because they were caught red handed LYING?
With every reference to this, you make yourself look more and more like the gullible fool that MAGA and it's leader depend upon.

Firstly, I wasn't "fooled" about anything as I didn't watch the edition of Panorama that featured the speech (edited it otherwise). Panorama typically command a viewing audience of 200-300k, so about the population of Southampton, hardly earth shattering numbers.

Secondly (and pertinent to your view of Trump threat of litigation), Panorama, as with all other terrestrial BBC programmes, is available only to the UK audience. Hardly likely to topple the man-baby even if everyone watched and agreed that he's well past his sell-by date.

Thirdly, the resignation of the two senior BBC executives shows that, unlike some places and organisations, they had the necessary integrity to recognise that while they were NOT personally responsible for the edits not the decision to air that edition of Panorama, the error was made in their watch. "The buck stops here", is a honourable and well respected stance, which some in the current US administration would do well to heed.

Fourthly, just how "vigilant" and/or "offended" are Trump and his acolytes when it's realised that it took an investigative journalist from the DAILY TELEGRAPH (UK newspaper) to "break the story" 12 MONTHS AFTER THE PANORAMA PROGRAMME WAS AIRED IN THE UK?

As I've suggested on numerous occasions, you may not know it, but you (and I suspect many who have your mind set), need help.