Prediction League Update 08/11 v Oxford

[Bombers right foot]

Bomber banned me because he supported you stabbing Boingy in the back and then referred to one word I had incorrectly spelt in my response, doing to me exactly what your good friend Baggieblood did to Soulman, which caused a brilliant poster to leave. I stated and evidenced that to Bomber by calling his post immature. Not him, just his post, given the circumstances witnessed on here only a few days previously. Like you say often, if you are unable to accept criticism or are easily offended then you should not be on this site.

You exclaimed on this forum, obviously unable to hide your joy, when Bomber said I was unable to participate in the prediction league. To that I refer you to the last sentence of my previous post.

On line bullying.

* Exclusion ? intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.


Explain how I have taken the urine out of Bombers excellent work. I simply refuse to be bullied by you or anyone else.

Not many poster defended me. I refer you to no 5 of my previous post the traits of a bully.

* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn?t want to get involved.

You just make it worse for yourself by digging a massive hole with so many untruths, compounded by more when you should perhaps stop digging.

And you still fail to evidence any of the lies you have posted in regard to me. Why, I would suggest because you are unable to. Show me I am wrong and provide the evidence to why you said I was homo***ual, why I micromanage staff, how you know I am Viaduct (I am not of course) and why you called me a dog turd.

Enjoy your day. I will mine.

This is my one and only response to you ever, you were banned because you were seen as a troublemaker and I didn?t like your posts where I was involved, it?s time to stop and move on, however carrying on with your tedious posts of the Prediction League will only see you banned next season as well

[On Balance]

This is my one and only response to you ever, you were banned because you were seen as a troublemaker and I didn?t like your posts where I was involved, it?s time to stop and move on, however carrying on with your tedious posts of the Prediction League will only see you banned next season as well

Hi Bomber,

Could we just pause and rewind for a moment. Bomber I have no issue with you. We disagreed on a thread which Baggieal initiated regarding Boingy, (Who I have never met and not is a friend of mine, he is simply another poster on a forum) to which I responded directly to Al saying what he wrote was uncalled for.

I would be grateful if you could point to which post you are referring to which you did not like. I can only think you refer to the thread I mention above, where Al posted that Boingy had fallen out with another on the new site, and posted only part of that thread on this site. What I disliked with the initial post was that Al, for whatever reason, posted only a single sentence of the post from the other site, which failed to provide a true reflection of the whole thread. Boingy and the other poster did not fall out. Indeed it was quite the opposite.

I believe Al was wrong to post the comments as he did. It was a fake assessment of the situation and I simply said it was uncalled for. Al responded and you followed in support of him on the Mason thread of the 19/09/25.

In one of your responses on that thread, you made three points and in my response to those three points, I responded and answered them all. In none of those posts on that thread did I use inappropriate language or make any inappropriate comments about yourself or other posters. Unfortunately that cannot be said of others, as I have been called vile and disgusting names on here and had untruthful reference made about my ***uality and my professionalism in the workplace.

In your thread of the 22/09/25, the one headed “Its goodbye from me,” let us be honest, you did get a little personal and ended by making a comment with regard to a misspelling I had made on a previous thread. I consider that reference inappropriate given the circumstances under which Soulman decided to stop posting only a few days earlier, when Baggieblood had made similar comments regarding Soulmans posts. I, along with others on here, made reference to Bloods comments as I have done so when another poster made disgusting comments aimed at Leicester. I will give Blood some credit, he did apologise. I did respond to your post and wrote “Not the most mature response Bomber.” I made it quite clear in the post I was referring to the Soulman situation and that my response was not about you personally, it was simply about the content of your post.

I will end by going back to where I started, and I understand you have stated above, it is your one and only response. However, in the interest of fairness, I would be grateful if you would highlight any post where I have been disrespectful to you, used inappropriate language or made statements regarding your personal life etc. If you do, I will apologise unreservedly and I would stop posting on the prediction league. If you are unable or do not wish to respond, then I accept that. In either case I would hope you do read this post and accept it in the spirit it is intended, reflect on its content and understand it is a genuine effort to clear up and clarify any misunderstandings. In either case, I would hope we could at least consider rewinding back to before the Baggial’s initial post and draw a line under it.

[baggieal]

Hi Bomber,

Could we just pause and rewind for a moment. Bomber I have no issue with you. We disagreed on a thread which Baggieal initiated regarding Boingy, (Who I have never met and not is a friend of mine, he is simply another poster on a forum) to which I responded directly to Al saying what he wrote was uncalled for.

I would be grateful if you could point to which post you are referring to which you did not like. I can only think you refer to the thread I mention above, where Al posted that Boingy had fallen out with another on the new site, and posted only part of that thread on this site. What I disliked with the initial post was that Al, for whatever reason, posted only a single sentence of the post from the other site, which failed to provide a true reflection of the whole thread. Boingy and the other poster did not fall out. Indeed it was quite the opposite.

I believe Al was wrong to post the comments as he did. It was a fake assessment of the situation and I simply said it was uncalled for. Al responded and you followed in support of him on the Mason thread of the 19/09/25.

In one of your responses on that thread, you made three points and in my response to those three points, I responded and answered them all. In none of those posts on that thread did I use inappropriate language or make any inappropriate comments about yourself or other posters. Unfortunately that cannot be said of others, as I have been called vile and disgusting names on here and had untruthful reference made about my ***uality and my professionalism in the workplace.

In your thread of the 22/09/25, the one headed “Its goodbye from me,” let us be honest, you did get a little personal and ended by making a comment with regard to a misspelling I had made on a previous thread. I consider that reference inappropriate given the circumstances under which Soulman decided to stop posting only a few days earlier, when Baggieblood had made similar comments regarding Soulmans posts. I, along with others on here, made reference to Bloods comments as I have done so when another poster made disgusting comments aimed at Leicester. I will give Blood some credit, he did apologise. I did respond to your post and wrote “Not the most mature response Bomber.” I made it quite clear in the post I was referring to the Soulman situation and that my response was not about you personally, it was simply about the content of your post.

I will end by going back to where I started, and I understand you have stated above, it is your one and only response. However, in the interest of fairness, I would be grateful if you would highlight any post where I have been disrespectful to you, used inappropriate language or made statements regarding your personal life etc. If you do, I will apologise unreservedly and I would stop posting on the prediction league. If you are unable or do not wish to respond, then I accept that. In either case I would hope you do read this post and accept it in the spirit it is intended, reflect on its content and understand it is a genuine effort to clear up and clarify any misunderstandings. In either case, I would hope we could at least consider rewinding back to before the Baggial’s initial post and draw a line under it.

You twist everything to your narrative. This actually started by Bomber taking offence because Boingy started it by making a disgusting comment about a person must be on drugs if they didn?t see what he did against Bournemouth when we were simply outplayed. Bomber then quite rightly made a point of saying the rose tinted specs had started on the other forum. He was right. Not in any bad way but clearly Steve who i know in person disagrees with must footballing comments made by Boingy. Like me - Steve spends money by going to the matches, Your comments to Bomber were uncalled for and he quite rightly banned you. Consider this Bomber puts in a lot of work on those match predictions so even the slightest uncalled for comment would niggle him as it would anyone else doing that job for the benefit of the board.

You twisted the information about Mick. You clearly did some background work to find his company on Companies House and made a comment that his company was not doing as well as he made out. You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!

You have always had an agenda OB to cause trouble and you think your clever but take it from me - your not! Your tedious match prediction scores have bored most posters and this has been a complete p iss take of Bombers work!

[On Balance]

You twist everything to your narrative. This actually started by Bomber taking offence because Boingy started it by making a disgusting comment about a person must be on drugs if they didn?t see what he did against Bournemouth when we were simply outplayed. Bomber then quite rightly made a point of saying the rose tinted specs had started on the other forum. He was right. Not in any bad way but clearly Steve who i know in person disagrees with must footballing comments made by Boingy. Like me - Steve spends money by going to the matches, Your comments to Bomber were uncalled for and he quite rightly banned you. Consider this Bomber puts in a lot of work on those match predictions so even the slightest uncalled for comment would niggle him as it would anyone else doing that job for the benefit of the board.

You twisted the information about Mick. You clearly did some background work to find his company on Companies House and made a comment that his company was not doing as well as he made out. You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!


You have always had an agenda OB to cause trouble and you think your clever but take it from me - your not! Your tedious match prediction scores have bored most posters and this has been a complete p iss take of Bombers work!

Another post Al, where you absolutely lie and twist things to suit your own agenda. I never for one moment thought you would accept my post, which was for Bomber, for what it was.

You keep suggesting I should apologise. I have provided you with so many opportunities to apologise for calling me a homo***ual and my wife a man, questioning my work ethics and calling me a dog turd. Have you apologised, no.

Why would anyone make an unsupported comment about another persons ***uality unless they wanted to gain the upper hand. One who uses such terminology indicates they think it funny or that a homo***ual person is there to be made fun of. It was used as a put down. Homophobia is still rife and using that on a public forum by anyone is disgraceful and wrong.

You have lied and continue to do so, twisting the truth of what I said in regards to Michd and the reference I made to companies house. It is fabricated lies. We all know the last time Mick posted on here. He may well come back and support you, however, the post is still there and the smilies stopped and so did Mick posting on here. I wish he would come back.

You may have support on here, it is certainly support of a minority and the silence of most is quite defaming. As I pointed out to you before regarding a bullies traits. Most people remain silent, not wishing to be involved.

You should perhaps listen to the Sarah Cox interview with Jeremy Vine last week. Perhaps read her book. You may recognise some traits of the people who subjected her to bullying.



The post was for Bomber, in an effort to close the issue, like I said above, I never thought you would understand that.

Below are traits of bullying. If others support you then good luck.

Bully traits.

* Ringleader - Initiating and leading the bullying but not always the person “doing” the bullying.
* Target - The person at whom the bullying is aimed. Assistant - Actively involved in “doing” the bullying but not leading it
* Reinforcer - Supports the bullying, might laugh or encourage other people to “collude.”
* Defender - Stands up for someone being bullied. Knows that bullying is wrong and feels confident enough to do something about it.
* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn’t want to get involved.


On line bullying.
* Exclusion – intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.

[baggieal]

Another post Al, where you absolutely lie and twist things to suit your own agenda. I never for one moment thought you would accept my post, which was for Bomber, for what it was.

You keep suggesting I should apologise. I have provided you with so many opportunities to apologise for calling me a homo***ual and my wife a man, questioning my work ethics and calling me a dog turd. Have you apologised, no.

Why would anyone make an unsupported comment about another persons ***uality unless they wanted to gain the upper hand. One who uses such terminology indicates they think it funny or that a homo***ual person is there to be made fun of. It was used as a put down. Homophobia is still rife and using that on a public forum by anyone is disgraceful and wrong.

You have lied and continue to do so, twisting the truth of what I said in regards to Michd and the reference I made to companies house. It is fabricated lies. We all know the last time Mick posted on here. He may well come back and support you, however, the post is still there and the smilies stopped and so did Mick posting on here. I wish he would come back.

You may have support on here, it is certainly support of a minority and the silence of most is quite defaming. As I pointed out to you before regarding a bullies traits. Most people remain silent, not wishing to be involved.

You should perhaps listen to the Sarah Cox interview with Jeremy Vine last week. Perhaps read her book. You may recognise some traits of the people who subjected her to bullying.



The post was for Bomber, in an effort to close the issue, like I said above, I never thought you would understand that.

Below are traits of bullying. If others support you then good luck.

Bully traits.

* Ringleader - Initiating and leading the bullying but not always the person “doing” the bullying.
* Target - The person at whom the bullying is aimed. Assistant - Actively involved in “doing” the bullying but not leading it
* Reinforcer - Supports the bullying, might laugh or encourage other people to “collude.”
* Defender - Stands up for someone being bullied. Knows that bullying is wrong and feels confident enough to do something about it.
* Outsider/Bystander - Ignores any bullying and doesn’t want to get involved.


On line bullying.
* Exclusion – intentionally leaving someone out of group messages, online apps, gaming sites and other online engagement.

Some posters know what you said about Mick as he?s personally told them. Looking up personal information on Companies House like you did after doing some digging of his company crossed the line. Creepy and sad!

You have constantly taken the p iss out of me calling me Alan even though another poster referenced he?s certainly not Alan but you continued. Boingy referencing drugs crossed the line which was why Bomber flew at him. For the record I detest drugs as someone close in our family overdosed and died. To call someone who spends money at matches and they don?t agree with your view on drugs - don?t you think that?s overstepping the mark?

On a recent post someone who comes on here too causing trouble called me racist blah blah and suggested I use the - I have black friends card blah blah.

I laughed it off and unlike you with Mick and could have crossed the line retaliated and got personal - I actually know the full identities of this person and what he does with the wife. Would I use personal information like you did? No not in a million!

The fact you continued to take the p iss out of Bombers predictions tells a story in itself about you!

I honestly think you need help as clearly you have issues or demons.

Call me Alan all you like if that?s what floats your boat.

PS - since Mick left the forum I must have done about six matches with him and both families are very close. Funny you then say a bit of banter between us made him leave the post. He eats s hit like I said and he probably thinks I drink too much 😂

The magic word to Bomber would have been SORRY but up until this week you have continued to take the p iss out of him week after week so one poster called you tedious and since your dictionary pops out time and time again.

Watch Celebs Race Around the World this Thursday and refocus your energy 😛

[On Balance]

Some posters know what you said about Mick as he?s personally told them. Looking up personal information on Companies House like you did after doing some digging of his company crossed the line. Creepy and sad!

You have constantly taken the p iss out of me calling me Alan even though another poster referenced he?s certainly not Alan but you continued. Boingy referencing drugs crossed the line which was why Bomber flew at him. For the record I detest drugs as someone close in our family overdosed and died. To call someone who spends money at matches and they don?t agree with your view on drugs - don?t you think that?s overstepping the mark?

On a recent post someone who comes on here too causing trouble called me racist blah blah and suggested I use the - I have black friends card blah blah.

I laughed it off and unlike you with Mick and could have crossed the line retaliated and got personal - I actually know the full identities of this person and what he does with the wife. Would I use personal information like you did? No not in a million!

The fact you continued to take the p iss out of Bombers predictions tells a story in itself about you!

I honestly think you need help as clearly you have issues or demons.

Call me Alan all you like if that?s what floats your boat.

PS - since Mick left the forum I must have done about six matches with him and both families are very close. Funny you then say a bit of banter between us made him leave the post. He eats s hit like I said and he probably thinks I drink too much ��

The magic word to Bomber would have been SORRY but up until this week you have continued to take the p iss out of him week after week so one poster called you tedious and since your dictionary pops out time and time again.

Watch Celebs Race Around the World this Thursday and refocus your energy ��

I stopped calling you Alan a number of months ago. You call me a dog turd and I call you Alan and your the offended party!

You call me homo***ual because you deem it funny or think homo***uals should be ridiculed and are lesser than others. You also stated that I micro manage staff and your offended because I called you Alan!

Now here?s the thing Al. You have never denied any of the above and you have never apologised for making those malicious defamatory and false statements about me on a public forum.

How would you know I was gay, how would you know I micro manage staff. You do not know me so why would you put that out there on a public forum. I think it is clear why.

With regards to Mickd, if I had checked him out on Companies House, and for the record I did not and have not, how would you or Mickd know. It is an open source web site.

Initially, you said I broke privacy laws but when asked how, you cannot explain how. Now you suggest I divulged information about Mick?s business and his business. Where and when. You cannot explain where or when. I have absolutely no idea what Micks business is other than what he regularly mentioned on here. I have absolutely no interest in what?s Micks business is.

Let?s look at it from your perspective and say your version was correct and I had looked up Micks company. Have I disclosed anything I found out about Mick or his company on this forum or anywhere else as you say I did. No. Why would I have not done so if I was that creepy person you suggest I am. Just like you, I wouldn?t do that even if I was in possession of such information. You will not answer this because what you have said is all untrue, fabricated to enhance your own standing. I know they are lies because I did not happen. If Mick says it did then he would also fall into that category. I would ask you to provide the evidence but you will not, because you cannot, because it did not happen.

You wrote, and I quote, ?You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!? [sic]. That statement is absolute lies, you really should be ashamed of yourself.

The above does not stand up to scrutiny Al. Credit agencies can check any of us out at anytime. What on earth you are trying to make up with statement is beyond me.

The post you refer to where Boingy mentioned drugs was not aimed at anyone person, unlike yours when you aimed your remarks about Boingy on the new site by partially relating one small part f a post. (see link post no. 4). https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38338488 It was aimed at a collective of posters with a differing view to Boingy?s. Once again you have lied/twisted the truth to support your argument and you have once again been found out. You take what Boingy stated totally out of context and twist it to fit your agenda.

I am sorry to hear of your loss of a close family member, sincerely sorry. I too detest drugs and believe me, we know personally how losing a loved one feels. I am totally against bullying Al and I will explain why. Like yourself, we have lost a close member of our family. We struggle with it every bloody day of our lives. They were young, very young. The depth of the online bullying and the bullying that they were subjected to at their school was only identified following their passing, and it was absolutely disgusting. The lies, the trying to get them disassociated from groups, the out and disgusting name calling, the instructions on how to end their life, that they would be better off dead and yes, why you made me so vexed with your homo***ual reference, was because they had subjected this absolutely wonderful young person to the very same taunts you have used, in an effort to get them disassociated from their friends. (They were not gay). It all came out at the inquest. So, when you mention what Boingy said about drugs and the fact you have taken it out of context, and your offended by it, it offends me when I consider your comments on here about my ***uality, your name calling, comments about my work ethic, and also your insinuating lies and comments with regard to Mickd.

We support groups and charities in regard to bullying. Take it from me we can spot one.

The fact I have continued with the prediction league, which you suggest is disrespectful (not the words you used) out of Bomber is silly. On the contrary, I enjoyed being part of the competition until thrown out for indicating that I believed a remark made by Bomber was immature.

You appear to condone Bombers reference to a misspelt word in my post, because you suggest it was offensive and I should apologise. Does this mean you condone Baggieblood for doing exactly the same to Soulman. I am sure you do not as it would would certainly display double standards if you support one and not the other based purely on a friendship.

I would normally apologise for mentioning a personal situation, the situation above in regard to our loved one. However, on this occasion I will not do so as I believe it needed saying for the simple reason that bullying, whether online, physical, and/or by any other means is absolutely not acceptable.

Lastly, in a previous post on this thread, I mentioned the Sarah Cox interview aired last week with Jeremy Vine in regard to her being bullied. Anyone reading this, just have a look at the link, it is only 57 seconds long.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQwyb-TjP8D/

Your last sentence of your post Al says it all really.

[baggieal]

I stopped calling you Alan a number of months ago. You call me a dog turd and I call you Alan and your the offended party!

You call me homo***ual because you deem it funny or think homo***uals should be ridiculed and are lesser than others. You also stated that I micro manage staff and your offended because I called you Alan!

Now here?s the thing Al. You have never denied any of the above and you have never apologised for making those malicious defamatory and false statements about me on a public forum.

How would you know I was gay, how would you know I micro manage staff. You do not know me so why would you put that out there on a public forum. I think it is clear why.

With regards to Mickd, if I had checked him out on Companies House, and for the record I did not and have not, how would you or Mickd know. It is an open source web site.

Initially, you said I broke privacy laws but when asked how, you cannot explain how. Now you suggest I divulged information about Mick?s business and his business. Where and when. You cannot explain where or when. I have absolutely no idea what Micks business is other than what he regularly mentioned on here. I have absolutely no interest in what?s Micks business is.

Let?s look at it from your perspective and say your version was correct and I had looked up Micks company. Have I disclosed anything I found out about Mick or his company on this forum or anywhere else as you say I did. No. Why would I have not done so if I was that creepy person you suggest I am. Just like you, I wouldn?t do that even if I was in possession of such information. You will not answer this because what you have said is all untrue, fabricated to enhance your own standing. I know they are lies because I did not happen. If Mick says it did then he would also fall into that category. I would ask you to provide the evidence but you will not, because you cannot, because it did not happen.

You wrote, and I quote, ?You then referenced others could check. Not nice when private information is on Companies House such as personal information and only those who would really want the information and know the Company would go looking ie credit agencies etc. Mick knows a lot of posters on this board and don?t you think he?s told them? Well he has!? [sic]. That statement is absolute lies, you really should be ashamed of yourself.

The above does not stand up to scrutiny Al. Credit agencies can check any of us out at anytime. What on earth you are trying to make up with statement is beyond me.

The post you refer to where Boingy mentioned drugs was not aimed at anyone person, unlike yours when you aimed your remarks about Boingy on the new site by partially relating one small part f a post. (see link post no. 4). https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38338488 It was aimed at a collective of posters with a differing view to Boingy?s. Once again you have lied/twisted the truth to support your argument and you have once again been found out. You take what Boingy stated totally out of context and twist it to fit your agenda.

I am sorry to hear of your loss of a close family member, sincerely sorry. I too detest drugs and believe me, we know personally how losing a loved one feels. I am totally against bullying Al and I will explain why. Like yourself, we have lost a close member of our family. We struggle with it every bloody day of our lives. They were young, very young. The depth of the online bullying and the bullying that they were subjected to at their school was only identified following their passing, and it was absolutely disgusting. The lies, the trying to get them disassociated from groups, the out and disgusting name calling, the instructions on how to end their life, that they would be better off dead and yes, why you made me so vexed with your homo***ual reference, was because they had subjected this absolutely wonderful young person to the very same taunts you have used, in an effort to get them disassociated from their friends. (They were not gay). It all came out at the inquest. So, when you mention what Boingy said about drugs and the fact you have taken it out of context, and your offended by it, it offends me when I consider your comments on here about my ***uality, your name calling, comments about my work ethic, and also your insinuating lies and comments with regard to Mickd.

We support groups and charities in regard to bullying. Take it from me we can spot one.

The fact I have continued with the prediction league, which you suggest is disrespectful (not the words you used) out of Bomber is silly. On the contrary, I enjoyed being part of the competition until thrown out for indicating that I believed a remark made by Bomber was immature.

You appear to condone Bombers reference to a misspelt word in my post, because you suggest it was offensive and I should apologise. Does this mean you condone Baggieblood for doing exactly the same to Soulman. I am sure you do not as it would would certainly display double standards if you support one and not the other based purely on a friendship.

I would normally apologise for mentioning a personal situation, the situation above in regard to our loved one. However, on this occasion I will not do so as I believe it needed saying for the simple reason that bullying, whether online, physical, and/or by any other means is absolutely not acceptable.

Lastly, in a previous post on this thread, I mentioned the Sarah Cox interview aired last week with Jeremy Vine in regard to her being bullied. Anyone reading this, just have a look at the link, it is only 57 seconds long.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQwyb-TjP8D/

Your last sentence of your post Al says it all really.

Have you received any help yet O/B as honestly you do need it. Full of lies. You made a sneering comment at the time insinuating that Mick?s accounts showed he wasn?t doing very well compared to what he?d indicated! So you 100% looked up his accounts which can only be done by doing some digging of his company. The post was obviously taken down by Mick very quickly as would anyone in his position and for the record Mick has told other posters on here he?s close too. You do forget Mick and I know a number of posters on here and meet up, go to matches or communicate in other ways. This is why your a good talking point along with another trouble causer who called me racist. Funny thing is I know his full identity and a friend buys from his wife but of cause that will remain confidential.

Baggieblood I have not met so very strange you say we are friends other than pass pleasantries on the forum and for your record I have always been close to Lloyd ( far more than you ) due to the mutual interests in our youngsters. Any name calling to you was past history in retaliation to your continuous p iss take of calling me Alan. My dad was called Alan and recently passed away so it was in very poor taste. I would therefore rather you had called me absolutely anything than that name taking the p iss!!!

The post when Boingy referenced drugs was actually aimed at anyone whose views were different as it mentioned ? anybody ?. So anybody who spent ?200 going to the match who had a different view - how do you think they would take that? Exactly as Bomber communicated with rage.

You continue to lie and cause trouble and to be brutally honest are boring. Bomber is a great guy and you are lucky he only banned you for this season. Keep up your p iss taking of his predictions and he will most likely ban you for life as he?s indicated. Not fair on other posters either who are either laughing at you or calling you tedious!

This is my last post ever to you like Bomber. I suggest you compose your own posts rather than cause trouble and don?t comment on any of mine, That way, there?s no chance of crossing paths with you ever again.

[On Balance]

Have you received any help yet O/B as honestly you do need it. Full of lies. You made a sneering comment at the time insinuating that Mick?s accounts showed he wasn?t doing very well compared to what he?d indicated! So you 100% looked up his accounts which can only be done by doing some digging of his company. The post was obviously taken down by Mick very quickly as would anyone in his position and for the record Mick has told other posters on here he?s close too. You do forget Mick and I know a number of posters on here and meet up, go to matches or communicate in other ways. This is why your a good talking point along with another trouble causer who called me racist. Funny thing is I know his full identity and a friend buys from his wife but of cause that will remain confidential.

Baggieblood I have not met so very strange you say we are friends other than pass pleasantries on the forum and for your record I have always been close to Lloyd ( far more than you ) due to the mutual interests in our youngsters. Any name calling to you was past history in retaliation to your continuous p iss take of calling me Alan. My dad was called Alan and recently passed away so it was in very poor taste. I would therefore rather you had called me absolutely anything than that name taking the p iss!!!

The post when Boingy referenced drugs was actually aimed at anyone whose views were different as it mentioned ? anybody ?. So anybody who spent ?200 going to the match who had a different view - how do you think they would take that? Exactly as Bomber communicated with rage.

You continue to lie and cause trouble and to be brutally honest are boring. Bomber is a great guy and you are lucky he only banned you for this season. Keep up your p iss taking of his predictions and he will most likely ban you for life as he?s indicated. Not fair on other posters either who are either laughing at you or calling you tedious!

This is my last post ever to you like Bomber. I suggest you compose your own posts rather than cause trouble and don?t comment on any of mine, That way, there?s no chance of crossing paths with you ever again.

Baggieal, you have alleged I looked up Micks details and made them public and that I had contravened privacy laws. I say I did not.

It is impossible for me to prove I did not because what you have alleged did not happen. However, as you made the allegation it is obvious you have the evidence to support it.

If you know I have acted as you suggest you must be able to identify me in order to state these allegations. You must know something about me, my name, my address where I work from, you must know this to be able to identify me, if what you wrote was true.

I give to you my full permission to publish on this forum any detail you have to identify me, i.e. name, dob, address, business addresses, telephone number etc. I would also accept as proof if you can provide any written material from this or any forum or other media, where I disclosed information regarding the other poster. I do this in order that you are able to unequivocally support the allegations you have made about me in relation to the aforementioned matter.

If you did disclose any or all of my personal information on this platform, I would take no action, legal or otherwise in respect of that disclosure.

Let’s say you have until midnight Sunday 16 November 2025 to provide evidence that supports your allegations.

If you fail to provide evidence of your allegations, I will accept it as proof you are not in possession of such and what you have written in respect of that matter is untrue.

I am confident you are unable to provide the above evidence because it did not happen. However, if by some miracle you do, I will leave the board and not return and you will have your wish.

[baggieal]

Baggieal, you have alleged I looked up Micks details and made them public and that I had contravened privacy laws. I say I did not.

It is impossible for me to prove I did not because what you have alleged did not happen. However, as you made the allegation it is obvious you have the evidence to support it.

If you know I have acted as you suggest you must be able to identify me in order to state these allegations. You must know something about me, my name, my address where I work from, you must know this to be able to identify me, if what you wrote was true.

I give to you my full permission to publish on this forum any detail you have to identify me, i.e. name, dob, address, business addresses, telephone number etc. I would also accept as proof if you can provide any written material from this or any forum or other media, where I disclosed information regarding the other poster. I do this in order that you are able to unequivocally support the allegations you have made about me in relation to the aforementioned matter.

If you did disclose any or all of my personal information on this platform, I would take no action, legal or otherwise in respect of that disclosure.

Let’s say you have until midnight Sunday 16 November 2025 to provide evidence that supports your allegations.

If you fail to provide evidence of your allegations, I will accept it as proof you are not in possession of such and what you have written in respect of that matter is untrue.

I am confident you are unable to provide the above evidence because it did not happen. However, if by some miracle you do, I will leave the board and not return and you will have your wish.

I said very clear and can even draw you a picture as it's not going in - on the forum you insinuated Mick's company was not as successful has he made out and others could see for themselves. Mick deleted the thread. You do NOT have to enter any personal details in Companies House to go through any companies accounts as they are public and we do it regularly. So why the hell would I know your personal identity or contact details? The fact you insinuated a person's company was not as successful as made out and it could be looked up on Companies House suggests you looked up the details and most information on a company includes directors personal addresses etc. So you are a creep and quite sad for doing this! I know the full identity of the person who has been on here a couple of times causing trouble not just to myself but why the hell would i release his personal information? I can take anything thrown at me apart from a constant p iss take of the same name of my father who passed which you did time and time again. Not nice and yes that was from you!

Is this clear? What do you not grasp about the above which Mick has verified the post reference to a couple of other posters who he's close friends with. Don't you think a number of us meet up? Clearly not!

Please please don't leave the board as your comedy albeit a trouble causer and no wonder Bomber banned you and the way your acting it will most likely be a life ban. You didn't even have it in you to say sorry to Bomber but continue to take the p iss! Not a nice individual are you O/B ( your name on this forum anyway )

Don't forget the 1% Club tonight!

[On Balance]

I said very clear and can even draw you a picture as it's not going in - on the forum you insinuated Mick's company was not as successful has he made out and others could see for themselves. Mick deleted the thread. You do NOT have to enter any personal details in Companies House to go through any companies accounts as they are public and we do it regularly. So why the hell would I know your personal identity or contact details? The fact you insinuated a person's company was not as successful as made out and it could be looked up on Companies House suggests you looked up the details and most information on a company includes directors personal addresses etc. So you are a creep and quite sad for doing this! I know the full identity of the person who has been on here a couple of times causing trouble not just to myself but why the hell would i release his personal information? I can take anything thrown at me apart from a constant p iss take of the same name of my father who passed which you did time and time again. Not nice and yes that was from you!

Is this clear? What do you not grasp about the above which Mick has verified the post reference to a couple of other posters who he's close friends with. Don't you think a number of us meet up? Clearly not!

Please please don't leave the board as your comedy albeit a trouble causer and no wonder Bomber banned you and the way your acting it will most likely be a life ban. You didn't even have it in you to say sorry to Bomber but continue to take the p iss! Not a nice individual are you O/B ( your name on this forum anyway )

Don't forget the 1% Club tonight!

I have asked you to prove it. Just prove it Al. I am not concerned about your tv viewing preferences because we are not big tv fans

Tick tock, tick tock.

Prove you are not a fantasist, someone who tells untruths to put others down.

I have, and would never make a statement about you that is not true.

Stand by what you have allege I have written on this or any other forum. No more dodging, no more it has been deleted, no more squirming or twisting, simply evidence it.

Prove I am homo***ual as you have said I am. Prove my wife is a man, like you said she was, Prove I am a dog turd, like you said I am and finally prove I did what you say I did with regard to M’d. Proof, proof, proof. Just prove. Stand by your statement.

Tick tock.

It is so simple.

Put up or shut up. Time is running out.