Election Year or Fear!

[Geoff Parkstone]

No idea why you’d say that, but if you ask Google, William Hill or the BBC you’ll get much the same answer and my guess is it’ll be a woman, with Jayne Turton the current favourite.

Ah, ok…the return of the old Faber get out clause…I was just ‘joshing’…and I’ve no idea what your mate is talking about - ‘leftist jealousy at the wealth of others’ - so I’ll leave you both to it.

Ah yes. Back to par. Happy to hand out consistent anti right wing criticism but can't take anti left wing criticism so runs away. So predictable ... But if you don't want to engage it's no problem

[ramAnag]

Ah yes. Back to par. Happy to hand out consistent anti right wing criticism but can't take anti left wing criticism so runs away. So predictable ... But if you don't want to engage it's no problem

Happier ‘engaging’ when you talk sense, GP.

Look at our exchange thus far. You’re intent on describing my comments as ‘anti right wing’ but they’re actually about individuals having too much influence over the UK media be they from the Right or the Left.

As it happens, in this instance, the individual concerned, Lord Rothermere, is Right wing. I’ve listed the publications/online sites he exerts enormous influence over and said that I find such a situation unhealthy in any democracy.

The fact is that any media bias in this country is very much in favour of the Right, with only the Guardian and the Mirror providing any sort of print based balance, and yet when the BBC messes up/makes an error the howls of outrage from those on the Right are both vociferous and limitless, including threats from the POTUS on this occasion.

[swaledale]

Ah yes. Back to par. Happy to hand out consistent anti right wing criticism but can't take anti left wing criticism so runs away. So predictable ... But if you don't want to engage it's no problem

Mm thats rich coming from someone who parrots fake right wing memes such as "sharia law" or "uncontrolled immigraton" or makes statements such as "90% of the population aren't sensible" (sic), demands evidence on statements and when presented with it, goes silent and fails to acknowledge they were wrong, misguied or perhaps unaware?