I see ManU have just sacked their manager. Its going to cost them a lot of severance pay as he is what just a third through his contract and so I repeat the same question again.
WHY do clubs sign managers and coaches for these long contracts when if they do poorly or not to expectation, they are face with multimillion pounds payoffs in compensation.
WHY don't they get ALL managers and Coaches to sign 6 month contracts renewable on performance?
ManU have paid tens of millions of pounds for sacking the last three managers when they could have paid a lot lot less. Question then becomes, why do clubs do this when they really don't have too..
Would you expect to stay in your job if you were useless after 6 months? Answer is obviously no..
IF all clubs did this, it would become the norm ie 6 months contract. They hardly expect managers and coaches to turn down ManU do they? Or any other PL club???
Its like playing football in the snow?
Sunbathing in May, June and July, is much more enjoyable than freezing your nuts off playing and watching football!
I ought to be the king regulator as I would sought all this stuff out!
We may have sacked all ours had that been the case??