Election Year or Fear!

[SithHappens]

Ok this one breaks my new years resolution somewhat, but rest assured temporarily.

Never thought I'd see Swale referring to someone as a "right wog hate monger and grifter". Been taking public speaking lessons from Alf Garnett?

Saw it and had a giggle. Pretty sure mistyped and raised a smile because swale probably last person who might use the term wog.

[ramAnag]

Saw it and had a giggle. Pretty sure mistyped and raised a smile because swale probably last person who might use the term wog.

I’m sure Swale meant ‘right wing’. He’s not immune to typos, but I am surprised ‘w@g’ got through seeing as we’re not allowed to say s*x, or vit@l. Just shows how bonkers those who run the site can be. (No, not you AF…the useless untouchables and uncontactables above you.)

[swaledale]

I’m sure Swale meant ‘right wing’. He’s not immune to typos, but I am surprised ‘w@g’ got through seeing as we’re not allowed to say s*x, or vit@l. Just shows how bonkers those who run the site can be. (No, not you AF…the useless untouchables and uncontactables above you.)

Eh yes mea culpa, must read my posts back, but when one has posted it twice, copied it and eventually got it posted one loses the will to live.

Mm I'd include the useleess untouchbles as AF, who always fails to make any sensible comment whenever his favoured right wing grifters are shown to be liars, purveyors of bull**** and hate.

But bizarrely comes down heavy when one accidentally infers that 40% of those "wonderful community minded" chaps and ladies who rioted, were known to the police in connection with domestic abuse, child abuse and ***ual offences. I wondered why he was so quick to be the "hard man" on that issue?

I mean its not like any of them would sue this site is it and it was probably not too big a correlation to say that if 40% of those arrested were known to the police, that a significant percentage of those ignorant thugs taking part were of similar ilk. But then it struk me, perhaps AF had friends involved in the riots, highly likely given he seems broadly supportive of racists, xenophobes islamaphobs and the like.

[Andy_Faber]

Eh yes mea culpa, must read my posts back, but when one has posted it twice, copied it and eventually got it posted one loses the will to live.

Mm I'd include the useleess untouchbles as AF, who always fails to make any sensible comment whenever his favoured right wing grifters are shown to be liars, purveyors of bull**** and hate.

But bizarrely comes down heavy when one accidentally infers that 40% of those "wonderful community minded" chaps and ladies who rioted, were known to the police in connection with domestic abuse, child abuse and ***ual offences. I wondered why he was so quick to be the "hard man" on that issue?

I mean its not like any of them would sue this site is it and it was probably not too big a correlation to say that if 40% of those arrested were known to the police, that a significant percentage of those ignorant thugs taking part were of similar ilk. But then it struk me, perhaps AF had friends involved in the riots, highly likely given he seems broadly supportive of racists, xenophobes islamaphobs and the like.

lol at your utter obsession with me