Political Thread in memory of David Reid. (R.I.P.)

[Supersub6]

Of course I know mon ami, that's why I posted it.

You little devil!

[sinkov]

Of course I know mon ami, that's why I posted it.

Fair enough mon ami, no complaints from me.

[sinkov]

Latest reports say there are 112 USAF C17s either in the Middle East or on their way there. FFS, talk about overkill, you'd think they were going to take China out, not half a dozen mad mullahs and their half-baked military.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Latest reports say there are 112 USAF C17s either in the Middle East or on their way there. FFS, talk about overkill, you'd think they were going to take China out, not half a dozen mad mullahs and their half-baked military.

The Yanks are simply demonstrating (once again) their global military dominance. We all know they can do what they want when they want, it just needs an orange painted lunatic to exercise that will instead of showing diplomatic restraint.

Interestingly, the global right wing media refuses to publish the news that all bets are off when it comes to nuclear weapon restraint. We are all doomed and no mistake.

[sinkov]

The Yanks are simply demonstrating (once again) their global military dominance. We all know they can do what they want when they want, it just needs an orange painted lunatic to exercise that will instead of showing diplomatic restraint.

Interestingly, the global right wing media refuses to publish the news that all bets are off when it comes to nuclear weapon restraint. We are all doomed and no mistake.

Trump is showing the most incredible restraint, he called the Israeli dogs off in summer when they had Iran at their mercy, and he's giving the Iranians chance after chance now to negotiate, but they're just playing silly buggers trying to buy time. None of it makes any difference, the Islamist ****s will be wiped out.

[sinkov]

"Looking at events in the US from a British perspective can be a difficult task. Much of the public here still rely on mainstream media for news reporting and commentary on US politics. The BBC’s deliberate doctoring of J6 footage, in which a flagship documentary was selectively edited by clipping different parts of a Trump speech to remove the segments that made it clear he was instructing people to protest peacefully, illustrates how false an image of events one can acquire by relying on these sources. What the BBC did was pure propaganda presenting an outright lie, the lie that Trump encouraged violence on J6, when the factual record, presented without editing, shows the exact opposite.

Millions of people in the UK still believe that Trump told his supporters to invade the Capitol building, or that he called for violence, based on this kind of doctored and biased reporting. We should therefore regard all mainstream reporting on what is currently happening in the US with an automatic scepticism, informed by the understanding that the British media, regardless of whether they call themselves left or right wing, intensely dislike Donald Trump and his government, and that they will break every traditional code of ethical journalism or professional standards to present this prejudice as factual and correct."

Yep, can't argue with that.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

"Looking at events in the US from a British perspective can be a difficult task. Much of the public here still rely on mainstream media for news reporting and commentary on US politics. The BBC’s deliberate doctoring of J6 footage, in which a flagship documentary was selectively edited by clipping different parts of a Trump speech to remove the segments that made it clear he was instructing people to protest peacefully, illustrates how false an image of events one can acquire by relying on these sources. What the BBC did was pure propaganda presenting an outright lie, the lie that Trump encouraged violence on J6, when the factual record, presented without editing, shows the exact opposite.

Millions of people in the UK still believe that Trump told his supporters to invade the Capitol building, or that he called for violence, based on this kind of doctored and biased reporting. We should therefore regard all mainstream reporting on what is currently happening in the US with an automatic scepticism, informed by the understanding that the British media, regardless of whether they call themselves left or right wing, intensely dislike Donald Trump and his government, and that they will break every traditional code of ethical journalism or professional standards to present this prejudice as factual and correct."

Yep, can't argue with that.

Who scribed this $hit?

[Supersub6]

Who scribed this $hit?

Jeremy Corbyn?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Jeremy Corbyn?

Right now he's about the only person in politics untouched by the Epstein Files mein freund.

[sinkov]

Right now he's about the only person in politics untouched by the Epstein Files mein freund.

Of course the crusty old anti-semite would have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein, he much prefers the company of Islamic terrorists to anyone called 'Epstein'. The clue's in the name.