Strange really, if you add it all up?.
I am neither for nor against MH. The jury is still out. But I cannot help thinking the alleged 95% against him is not the entire number polled who attend a game.
I can see why some on here are getting hot under the collar. We are not in a great position, true.
Consistency is out the window, but we know why, that is down to injured players in and out, not a best settled side. 100%.
People are picking over reason why, some right, some wrong, some guesswork.

look at the donny game. If not for a keeper who has cost us many points, there would have been a draw most likely. 1pt.

The plymouth a deserved win with a line up change that plus gore and powell coming back, if we can keep all fit, we stand more than a chance.
3pts.
And then players out and team disrupted. Mansfield, a draw. 1pt.
Hudders bar a freak goal, another draw. 1pt.

A win, 3 draws. Mid table fare. A close call if you look at those games. Fresh legs at the beginning of those games.
Benson and watmore playing well, but it proves once one goes injured, the other legs go, for now, things destabilise again.
Four games.
A damned sight better than we were doing before?.but look how long powell, gore disappeared for, while other players were in and out.

We have a complex number of issues. Medical staff, not enough. Old players, injury prone ones, young inexperienced kids and some in my opinion like martha look disinterested. Defence, look how well Douglas was doing, made Jules look a pedestrian half the time.

I do not know if MH is able to make any of this better. What I do believe for a fact, if what I can see for sure, if we had removed Dawson much earlier like Oct. Had the likes of Gray, Nombe at his fittest all the time, Gore there, powell, integrated Douglas, baptise or agbaire,
as a core basic unit, things would have been different.

The point is much is down to injuries, and of course, watmore, gray, could not be here sooner. Stewart said, or gave instructions to say MH would be given the tools. Really. Has that happened fully?

We will not find out if someone else over these weeks could have done any better. We just do not know.

But what I do know and have seen, with players gelling and fit, if only for one half, all together, playing in much the same way, they did well. So at that point, the first half in one game against the great plymouth, not, we ran rings round them, then another game for the 20 in a second half.
Which shows the application of what is cannot be all bad. But things are conspiring. It has to be factored in.

More of what we have seen in two games, cannot be just ignored, because the players were mostly not there before and we had problems.
Could kelly replace gore and do the same? Of course not. This is just one example. There are other areas just the same.

We are guessing one way and the other if things could be better or will be with a free hand next time around.
We have spent little money, deadwood hanging over. Patched up in january, and recently shown we can play when key players are fit.

All the negatives are for good reason, clear to see. And the club as a whole are responsible, injuries have seen to the rest. Whether team management could have made any difference, with a neutral head, I do not think any of us can truly know.

Simply because of injuries and constant necessary changes.