He's appeared in all but three of the league games, I'd guess he's already passed it.
|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
According to Advertiser, Joe Rafferty has an auto extension if he plays so many games.
Question, if he is getting near - do you drop him so we dont have to auto extend?
Play him regardless
Play him because you want him to extend?
For me, if hall back - dont play him or use Cover instead
He's appeared in all but three of the league games, I'd guess he's already passed it.
Auto extend, in what sense? In favour of whom?
If the dippys at nys control central have let an aging player on a two year contract, be able to force the club to keep on after the two years they want their bumps felt.
It would be the most calamitous neglect of contract common sense.
Assuming so, how much damage did Evans do we do not know about?
Horses get put out to grass.
Players now come to NYS.
Joe R, like quite a few, at first was fairly nippy for his age, played well. That is some time ago. You could say been played well out of position, should be in a back 4. I would agree.
If LC plays that way, we will see what he may still be able to do…..beyond appearing.
We need players being played to their strengths, in position natural to them, all of them. The contract situation of all of them needs attention and any incoming, not just Joe’s.
Quite what the nitty gritty of any player contract details these days are, particularly at our club must be interesting. It takes us so long to get some of them over the line, it beggars belief.
If any player can be let to trigger a year to be allowed to stay, and potentially a soft year risk, in my view it is poor. However, at present all we have I assume is a scant quote by a journalist which could be ambiguous.