Stirling Albion v Aberdeen

[ZakkTheMakk]

I wouldn’t have thought it would have mattered what the Huns line up was.

Surely even a second string team should be destroying Morton at home?

You said their fans wouldn’t accept a poor performance against a lower league team.

I would imagine they don’t really care.

You imagine? So you don't know?

Well I imagine they do really care, wow that was remarkable easy to type with nothing to back up what I just wrote.

[rico94]

You imagine? So you don't know?

Well I imagine they do really care, wow that was remarkable easy to type with nothing to back up what I just wrote.

No I don’t know as I haven’t went on to one of their fans forums to find out.

Can you go on and have look and let me know if they care?

[ZakkTheMakk]

No I don’t know as I haven’t went on to one of their fans forums to find out.

Can you go on and have look and let me know if they care?

So you don't know as I thought.

You're making a statement as if it's factual but in reality you have no idea, that's a great way to live your life.

How's about you pop on in there and see what the majority are saying instead? They live in the same delusional world as you do it appears so they're more kindred to you than to myself.

[NaeMairNeeps]

Holy fvck ZakkTheMakk ... ye might nae be a bed-wetter or a gusset-gusher, but yer knickers, dry as they might be, are fairly in a twist. It's a fitba forum min ... folk WILL disagree wi' ye, and expectin' tae be immune fae a bit o' 'coorse humour' is like seekin' a position o' privilege.

Calm doon min, we're aa on the same side at the end o' the day.

[ZakkTheMakk]

Holy fvck ZakkTheMakk ... ye might nae be a bed-wetter or a gusset-gusher, but yer knickers, dry as they might be, are fairly in a twist. It's a fitba forum min ... folk WILL disagree wi' ye, and expectin' tae be immune fae a bit o' 'coorse humour' is like seekin' a position o' privilege.

Calm doon min, we're aa on the same side at the end o' the day.

Funny, seems to be because I dared to highlight some things I've noticed since the start of the season that my comments were unwarranted and basically I'm in the wrong when I'm still waiting for anyone on here to point out what exactly I said wasn't factually correct?

Surely if people on here disagree with the comments I put forward they'd be inclined to actually say what it is that they disagree with in a well mannered response?

A forum implies discussion but sadly it was more, Zakk you're a bed wetter, Zakk you want Robson gone, Zakk you expect to pump lower league teams etc etc when none of those things are what I was saying.

If people haven't the intelligence to contest the points I raised then maybe it's best they don't put forward their attempts at "humour" instead?

[rico94]

Is Zak the new angry guy on this forum

What happened to the Greek guy who got angry all the time then claimed his mate stole his phone and posted stuff on here?

I liked him better.

[NaeMairNeeps]

Sorry min, but factually correct disna come intae it. We are expressing opinions based on a match and speculating on how we will do from here on.

You are not wrong to express your own opinion, and by the same token, others are not wrong to express theirs ... even if it does differ from yours. I dinna see anybody sayin' yer comments were unwarranted, by merely responding, they prove otherwise.

I will say though, the total of your comments display a glaring intolerance of the views of others .... maybe this is not your intention, but that's how it appears to me.

As for humour? ... Errm ... this would be a very, very, very dull forum without it ... get used tae it min.

[mondo_notion]

Seems to be a right piley on on Zakk. I went back and read post#29 and can't really see anything too controversial. We were ****e, he's only stating what anyone else who watched it would be thinking.

He wouldn't even get a mention in the top 50 pant pishers we've had in these here parts.

Well maybe top 50 is pushing it a bit but definitely not the top 25.

I see no one has challenged him to a square go outside the Pitt with appropriate outer wear. All talk no trousers you bunch.

[donsdaft]

Is Zak the new angry guy on this forum

What happened to the Greek guy who got angry all the time then claimed his mate stole his phone and posted stuff on here?

I liked him better.

Ah, Stav.

I'm pretty sure he wasn't Greek but absolutely certain he was a heid the ba.

[rico94]

Seems to be a right piley on on Zakk. I went back and read post#29 and can't really see anything too controversial. We were ****e, he's only stating what anyone else who watched it would be thinking.

He wouldn't even get a mention in the top 50 pant pishers we've had in these here parts.

Well maybe top 50 is pushing it a bit but definitely not the top 25.

I see no one has challenged him to a square go outside the Pitt with appropriate outer wear. All talk no trousers you bunch.

Maybe you can remind us when you have challenged someone to a square go on here before?