O/T:- Who needs Parliament?

[drillerpie]

civility will start breaking out.

Hear hear!

[drillerpie]

That's 3/3 and 4/4.

[i961pie]

Yeah, totally out of place on here. Sorry to everyone for the moderate language and raising the tone

I should think so

[TheBlackHorse]

... sorry Drilly, but I often become suspicious when someone quotes 'the law'. Try reading Article 50 ... it states that if no agreement is made, exit occurs in any event two years after notification. The extension after 31st March was phoney as would be any further extension. I decided not to use the word illegal, fearing it may upset the more lilly-livered, traitorous Remoaners. As ever, it's the self-serving EU bending the rules to suit their own need to continue screwing the UK; something Remoaners conveniently ignore.

[Elite_Pie]

That's 3/3 and 4/4.

Yep, two quick own goals from Notsohumblepie!

[magpie_mania]

... sorry Drilly, but I often become suspicious when someone quotes 'the law'. Try reading Article 50 ... it states that if no agreement is made, exit occurs in any event two years after notification. The extension after 31st March was phoney as would be any further extension. I decided not to use the word illegal, fearing it may upset the more lilly-livered, traitorous Remoaners. As ever, it's the self-serving EU bending the rules to suit their own need to continue screwing the UK; something Remoaners conveniently ignore.

How is it illegal anyway?

'Failure to do so results in the exiting state falling out of the EU with no new provisions in place, unless every one of the remaining EU states agrees to extend the negotiations.'

Something leavers conveniently ignore.

[countygump]

How is it illegal anyway?

'Failure to do so results in the exiting state falling out of the EU with no new provisions in place, unless every one of the remaining EU states agrees to extend the negotiations.'

Something leavers conveniently ignore.

TBH, may well be referring to this:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...rt-case-appeal

[TheBlackHorse]

... thanks Gumpy ... but I was commenting directly upon that which I read in the Article 50 document. I'd sooner not rely on the interpretation of someone else even if they're right too!

[drillerpie]

... thanks Gumpy ... but I was commenting directly upon that which I read in the Article 50 document. I'd sooner not rely on the interpretation of someone else even if they're right too!

Yes you and the other bloke sitting behind his computer are definitely right and the judge is wrong.

[countygump]

Yes you and the other bloke sitting behind his computer are definitely right and the judge is wrong.

Unless the plaintiff's name happens to be Gina Miller, it seems.