+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 118

Thread: Admin looming

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,854
    MDS have a lot to say on the ground question. It's in hock to them for £20M or maybe more. I have been told that, if Mel (or whoever is responsible now we're in admin) doesn't pay up then Dell gets the ground by default.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,350
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    MDS have a lot to say on the ground question. It's in hock to them for £20M or maybe more. I have been told that, if Mel (or whoever is responsible now we're in admin) doesn't pay up then Dell gets the ground by default.
    It would be a very foolish businessman that ever wrote such a contract, more likely they have a thing called a ‘lien’ which gives them ‘possession’ /control until the debt is paid.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,926
    Reading more about Derby's debts, I am staggered that we seem to owe circa £26 million to HMRC, how the **** did it get to that stage?

    It really seems that Mel has completely ****ed up in his desperate attempts to get promotion, I just hope he hasn't ****ed the club fatally, because there is a new rule now in force which says that HMRC should be paid in full.

    Its a mess and we could see liquidation unless HMRC agree some reduction in the debt owed to them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,854
    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post
    Reading more about Derby's debts, I am staggered that we seem to owe circa £26 million to HMRC, how the **** did it get to that stage?

    It really seems that Mel has completely ****ed up in his desperate attempts to get promotion, I just hope he hasn't ****ed the club fatally, because there is a new rule now in force which says that HMRC should be paid in full.

    Its a mess and we could see liquidation unless HMRC agree some reduction in the debt owed to them.
    Not just a rule Swale, it's Law.

    Two ways of looking at it.

    One, they accept a lower amount. That way they get something rather than nothing.

    Two, they must be right royally pi55ed off at having club after club sticking it to them and having to accept a % of the debt. Sooner or later they will demand their full pound of flesh and the club involved will cease to exist and that will be a warning to all other clubs to make sure they pay HMRC on time and in full. I just hope they don't choose DCFC as the vehicle they make an example of.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    7,546
    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post
    Reading more about Derby's debts, I am staggered that we seem to owe circa £26 million to HMRC, how the **** did it get to that stage?

    It really seems that Mel has completely ****ed up in his desperate attempts to get promotion, I just hope he hasn't ****ed the club fatally, because there is a new rule now in force which says that HMRC should be paid in full.

    Its a mess and we could see liquidation unless HMRC agree some reduction in the debt owed to them.
    Which adds an interesting angle to the "profit on sale of Pride Park" at a high value on an arms length basis. Capital Gains tax at 19% on, say, 50 million book profit would be maybe £ 10 million. If its a pure capital gain DCFC most unlikely to be able to roll forward trading losses against it.

    Add VAT, including 12 month covid deferral of payment, and PAYE EENI and ERNIIE perhaps 6+ months in arrears and you're getting there.

    Buts its the CGT on the ground sale aspect that hasnt been picked up on anywhere that I have seen - after all you cannot make a huge chunk of profit for P&s / FFP reasons this way and not and up with a tax bill, can you?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    Which adds an interesting angle to the "profit on sale of Pride Park" at a high value on an arms length basis. Capital Gains tax at 19% on, say, 50 million book profit would be maybe £ 10 million. If its a pure capital gain DCFC most unlikely to be able to roll forward trading losses against it.

    Add VAT, including 12 month covid deferral of payment, and PAYE EENI and ERNIIE perhaps 6+ months in arrears and you're getting there.

    Buts its the CGT on the ground sale aspect that hasnt been picked up on anywhere that I have seen - after all you cannot make a huge chunk of profit for P&s / FFP reasons this way and not and up with a tax bill, can you?
    True, but then surely you pay the taxman or he requests his pound of flesh - very odd and an utter shambles!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    7,546
    Don't forget those accounts were not finalised for a long time (not even sure they are now!) And so the tax returns wouldn't have either.

    The ground sale looks to have been "non cash" so we wouldn't necessarily have any cash to pay the CGT.

    Plus HMRC have traditionally been a bit of a soft touch for "cheap credit" especially in the past 18 months of COVID.

    That's my guess anyway, and no more than that

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,618
    What I don't understand is, how it all got this far?
    We had winding up petitions thrown at us like confetti?
    Did firms/hmrc try this?
    Or were the books cooked so good, it was hidden?

    https://www.accountancydaily.co/nott...ng-order-touch

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    What I don't understand is, how it all got this far?
    We had winding up petitions thrown at us like confetti?
    Did firms/hmrc try this?
    Or were the books cooked so good, it was hidden?

    https://www.accountancydaily.co/nott...ng-order-touch
    My take on that is that Forest's management knew how to play a dangerous game and Derby's didn't

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,498
    So with the PL confirming the Newcastle takeover does that pave the way for Mike Ashley to come and spend his 300 million he's just pocketed, I mean if he wants the ground as well he'll probably need a bit more like

Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •