DFCSS rears its ugly head again

[Deeranged]

Sculpture ������

Sorry cudnae help it.

Couldnae think o' another description

[Returnofrros]

Couldnae think o' another description

Curious....wud you be for a "rebranding" of dfcss?

I know the answer maybe why shud they but hypothetically?

[Deeranged]

Curious....wud you be for a "rebranding" of dfcss?

I know the answer maybe why shud they but hypothetically?

All for it, I believe that because of certain current DFCSS board influences there will never be agreement between them and the club. I know why and whether I agree with the stance taken by the club or not is irrelevant. I also believe that with the correct people on board amity could be reached. I also believe that with weak people on board the entrenched rights would be too easily surrendered which would not be in the interests of the fans for reasons I'm sure we all know.

[Returnofrros]

All for it, I believe that because of certain current DFCSS board influences there will never be agreement between them and the club. I know why and whether I agree with the stance taken by the club or not is irrelevant. I also believe that with the correct people on board amity could be reached. I also believe that with weak people on board the entrenched rights would be too easily surrendered which would not be in the interests of the fans for reasons I'm sure we all know.

That's interesting, didn't expèct that.

So wud rather the dfcss board influences walked away, voted off by current members or an uptake In membership and voted off?

I was under the impression you were happy with a low membership as the A Shares would be in safe keeping....do you think an enlarged membership would weaken Dfcss will?

Remind me you are a member but just not an office bearer?

[Deeranged]

That's interesting, didn't expèct that.

So wud rather the dfcss board influences walked away, voted off by current members or an uptake In membership and voted off?

I was under the impression you were happy with a low membership as the A Shares would be in safe keeping....do you think an enlarged membership would weaken Dfcss will?

For me we need a strong supporters' organisation numbers wise with strong board level leadership that will protect the entrenched rights. DSA will never be that organisation (without significant strengthening at the top) so DFCSS is the only option at the moment. They have a strong board but it's not one that will ever be accepted by FPS and hey suffer from very low membership partly because the brand carries historic barriers for many supporters. That leaves the options you've outlined in your second paragraph but again my own opinion is irrelevant.

End of the day I don't care who holds the A shares as long as it's not the club owners at any time, in order that that the rights are protected, or I can see us being at Tannadice as either lodgers or worse.

For the record being at Tannadice or involved with that lot in any way, manner or form would end my association with DFC completely.

[Taintedice]

End of the day I don't care who holds the A shares as long as it's not the club owners at any time, in order that that the rights are protected, or I can see us being at Tannadice as either lodgers or worse.

It has to be the ultimate irony that in order to seal their position after admin 2, DFCSS made an agreement with John Bennett for his support in exchange for a 100% rise in the rent for Dens, which is the major reason why it's no longer affordable. Couldn't mark your neck with the proverbial blowtorch. Anyway, if a rogue owner came along, it would be the rank and file who would stop moves to Tannadice, not a bunch of puffed-up, self-indulgent, arrogant hypocrites like you and yours.

[Deeranged]

It has to be the ultimate irony that in order to seal their position after admin 2, DFCSS made an agreement with John Bennett for his support in exchange for a 100% rise in the rent for Dens, which is the major reason why it's no longer affordable. Couldn't mark your neck with the proverbial blowtorch. Anyway, if a rogue owner came along, it would be the rank and file who would stop moves to Tannadice, not a bunch of puffed-up, self-indulgent, arrogant hypocrites like you and yours.

Sorry, but if you're just going to insult people maybe it's time you stepped out of the discussion?

[Taintedice]

Sorry, but if you're just going to insult people maybe it's time you stepped out of the discussion?

It's my thread ye tube Good to see you're talking to me now, well done on finding that wee bit of maturity.

[BCram]

It has to be the ultimate irony that in order to seal their position after admin 2, DFCSS made an agreement with John Bennett for his support in exchange for a 100% rise in the rent for Dens, which is the major reason why it's no longer affordable. Couldn't mark your neck with the proverbial blowtorch. Anyway, if a rogue owner came along, it would be the rank and file who would stop moves to Tannadice, not a bunch of puffed-up, self-indulgent, arrogant hypocrites like you and yours.

Was not aware of this fact. What would have happened if they had not made the decision they did?

[Taintedice]

Was not aware of this fact. What would have happened if they had not made the decision they did?

Decision? Dirty backroom deal, you mean?