Just remember black lives matter.

[outwoodclaret]

One thing we don't put on the curriculum is our despicable colonial, imperialist past.

The Empire and Colonies are indeed on the curriculum BT at least at the level I studied. Whether the correct balance is being achieved in the teaching of this subject however is certainly moot. I would like to see some comparative teaching here. Perhaps we could look at the same time at say the 20th century Ottoman and Japanese Empires. Or how does one approach current Chinese behaviour in Tibet and Hong Kong or towards the Uighurs? Is China now an Imperial power? Then again how do we teach about Saudi Arabia and the House of Saud? Their record on human rights, their legal system and the treatment of dissent. Is the West culpable of ignoring abuses in Saudi Arabia because the Saudis are regarded as a major ally in maintaining stability in the Middle East? I remain worried BT that fuelled by social media people will jump to quick answers to what are definitely not simple questions.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

The history of the world has been dotted with despotic regimes outwood. We had our turn, and sugar coating our colonial British Empire past does no-one any good.

Thankfully we have never tried mass extermination of a religious culture, nor as far as I know have we got the equivalent of the Japanese Rape of Nanking written into our history.

[outwoodclaret]

I am not defending the wrongs committed during the British Empire BT. They are indeed well documented. So is the role Britain played in bringing an end to the slave trade internationally through the West African squadron. I haven’t heard much about that. The latest absurdity on Robert Peel? He set up the Police Force. The Police force are racist so he shouldn’t have a statue. Also he discriminated against Catholics. As a young man indeed he was nicknamed “Orange Peel”. Delving a little deeper any researcher would find he changed his mind and acted on it. Where is it all going? Better getting working on that curriculum pdq I would say before the Romans get here.

[army88]

[QUOTE=The Bedlington Terrier;39509591]I hear what you say army88, but I vehemently disagree.

Time and time again Johnson and the Tory party display the kind of overt racism that blows my mind. Read post 106, it's eloquence takes some beating.

Time and time again Johnson and Pritti Patel have had the opportunity not to deport people who have made their lives and families here.

Quite often these people have no familial connections in the Caribbean and yet they are still chucked on "Do One Airlines". Tory policy often, and much too often for my liking embarrasses me to be English.


Interestingly you mention Boris being racist again I mean he has Risi Sunak and Priti Patel in his cabinet ( is it just racism to negro black now or is it any black ethnic culture ? )

I watched Priti in an interview the other day where they tried the race card with her and eloquently replied what you don’t think I was called a paki when growing up ? Brilliant put the racist bigot questioning her right in his place .


The more I read your posts about how racist Boris and his party his the more I realise you are trundling along with the rest of left latching onto anything to unseat unsettle and divide the government and eventually the country.

I read yesterday that one organiser protester had COVID 19 From the crowd of 5000 I wander if he’s transferred it to many and they will die soon ( will black - white lives matter to you and all those people).

This really has spiralled so far out of control it’s untrue and they have the white people - business on the run because they’re frightened to death to even have an opinion now, and that’s because you point the figure and shout racist.

I’ve posted this previously and I’m convinced it’s true you and the others have pushed racism in this country back a hundred years , you might think it’s all great and your getting what you want but trust me your not.

You have created and underlying unrest that will turn to hate in a lot of cases if it carries on like this, rationally everything you want is / was doable but with every body on board and pulling in the same direction what you have succeeded in doing is going in ten directions and that’s why it won’t work.

You could say that it’s a minority left that’s ruining it for everyone but I don’t hear anyone really condoning any of it or what’s happened, the so called superstars of the world , all you get is yes everyone do
It peacefully- there is no
Passion to stop this before it boils over from the icons or people that matter.

Our police on a knee for black
Lives matter and punched and kicked the same afternoon doesn’t quite stack up for me.


But as I’ve also said before Divide and Conquer, this in America was to divide the country incite the blacks and get Trump
Out of power ( if he gets in again - oh how I’ll laugh at the underhand tactics to remove him from power ).

How anyone would want the other Creepy candidate in charge is beyond me.

[outwoodclaret]

So at last Sadiq Khan speaks up. For weeks the streets of London have been choked with mass protests, his police officers attacked and now he has issued a warning to far right groups to keep away. If he was doing his job this would not be happening. Absolutely gutless and the Labour Party just blames it all on the Government. I wonder how the Labour administrations in Manchester and Bury are going to respond?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Blinking heck army88, I have no idea why me saying I find it perverse that our privileged white male Prime Minister claims we who live in the United Kingdom are not living in a racist society. In incredulity when I say, I wonder what he has done with the “picaninnies with watermelon smiles and the women in burkas who resemble letter boxes” is setting back race relations in this country a "hundred years"?

Anthony Joshua advocating segregation is beyond me. Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks and their ilk fought tooth and nail and in some lives lost their lives so black people could access white owned businesses, restaurants and shops. Asking them now to segregate once again seems like lunacy to me. What next - black ghettoes?

Hauling down statues, defiling Churchill's memorial and daubing BLM in red paint across our national cenotaph is ironic in the extreme. Churchill singlehandedly in my opinion galvanised a generation to oppose fascism, desecrating his memory by anti-fascists gives me the Homer Simpson moment of all Homer Simpson moments.

Attachment 16021

Just to be clear I will "take a knee" for no-one, and I do not think our police force should show subservience to the very people who are physically assaulting them.

I cannot abide racism and quite frankly I do not think it is a political issue. I judge a person by the strength of their character not the colour of their skin. I see little strength of character being displayed by Johnson, Patel, Truss, Gove, Raab, Buckland, Hancock, Coffey, Williamson and Shapps, et al do you?

It really is no good speculating as to what Corbyn would do, but I'm pretty sure he would make a better fist of handling this corona virus malarkey than this set of disingenuous, lying T W A T S would do. Barnard Castle anyone?

Regarding Trump. I recently watched a documentary about the so-called "Central Park Five". It blew the lid right off the top of my head. It defines Trump in all of his bile, hate, prejudice and vanity. My God he is one hateful, despicable human being, and boy does he know how to divide and rule?

[outwoodclaret]

Deleted

[Balanbam00]

Norder : Oh but the British in India ?? To come home with trillions - ''divide and rule''.

https://youtu.be/OIVPi0bvmtI

[Balanbam00]

When India had become nation-less for the second time, the Muslims invaded the country. And when India had become nationless for the third time, the British incursion into India began. The British very easily conquered the nation-less India.
The Muslims no doubt conquered India, but they looked upon it as their mother country. Nobody would say that they only exploited India as foreigners; but the case of the British was different. They came to India not to settle but to earn money.

To achieve their agenda, the British rulers hosted three "Round Table Conferences" in London whereby leaders of India's various communities rallied to get their share. This was actually the start of the communal award wherein all stakeholders / communities were invited to London to discuss the allocation of political power in India. So it was, that in 1932, the Britishers extended limited autonomy to India with the British leaders still controlling the Central Government and having the final say. So now all the communities - Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Dalits, businessmen, kings - had a vote and political seats were granted on a communal basis. This happened gradually over the course of time. This inevitably led to heated competition among these communities in order to gain power.

MK Gandhi committed a major blunder by supporting the partition of India and accepting the communal award in 1932. To break India into pieces, the colonial powers (i.e. the Britishers) introduced the communal award. This meant that political seats were allocated based on religion and social class etc: Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Dalits, businessmen, kings, etc. Each community was given a limited share of the power. The agenda of the colonial powers was to increase tension and instigate infighting amongst all Indians. Their plan was to incite them to attack each other and break India into countless pieces on a communal basis.

As is well documented, in the 19th century, there was harmony between Hindus and Muslims. For centuries they had lived together in India - side by side. For more about this, reference Prout philosophy's book "To The Patriots". But after their united revolt against the British rulers in the 19th century, those British rulers planned to break the unity between the Hindus and Muslims by increasing communal tension. In a very deliberate and devious manner, the Britishers started granting favours in the form of higher posts, political power and other perks to one community or the other. The aim was to create tension between Hindus and Muslims - as well as with other communities within India.

[outwoodclaret]

I thought Gandhi opposed partition but Jinnah demanded a separate Muslim state which became Pakistan.