+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 12 of 18 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 197

Thread: coaches engaging in legal ***ual activity

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    Sorry, but no, I'm not accepting this. You've misrepresented my position a few times recently, I'm not trying to blame the townsfolk for everything. Of course the perpetrators are responsible, and the authorities must shoulder a huge amount of blame for their failings in allowing it to go on at the scale it did, but its nonsense to suggest people didn't realise girls this young were having multiple ***ual partners, and its a matter of recorded fact that the people of Rotherham thought of these girls as being willful participants rather than victims.

    On the issue of coercion, a 12 year old cannot consent to ***. If you want to make the legal argument here its surely case open and closed?

    Interestingly, the story doesn't end there. The individuals in question did go to jail in 2017. Obviously the police must shoulder some significant blame for this not happening in 2001, but against a backdrop of public indifference.

    Rather than take my words for it, lets get words from the actual victim:
    https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/cse-t...c-abuse-448060

    This is how a 12-year-old girl who was being ***ually abused says she was made to feel by her white working class community:
    "She described how she was shunned by many in her community who called her worse things than a 'dirty, cheap slag'.


    She said: "No-one understood. No-one wanted to understand.

    "I felt lost, isolated, trapped, ashamed and completely worthless."

    But everyone can stick their fingers in their ears and convince themselves they'd have been horrified "if only they had known"

    It actually makes no difference now, there's little to be achieved in feeling guilty about it. Of course nobody realised the extent of it.

    The entire reason I make this point at all is because right now, in 2020, people are still questioning why the victims of abuse don't "just say no". I've been reading Sammy Woodhouse's book and its quite horrifying to see how the groomers operated, and of course these girls didn't feel like victims at the time. Maybe if the people in their communities had perceived them as victims rather than sl*gs they might have seen things differently?

    All I'm trying to do is politely point out the dangers of victim blaming so we don't make the same mistakes again. I'm not trying to make anyone feel guilty for what happened back then, or blame anyone other than the perpetrators for their actions, just to recognise that we do as a society have an important role in how we perceive the victims of these crimes.

    If you want to see the extent of the victim blaming going on back then, there is a whole trove of articles:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-partners.html

    After a 12-year old named 5 ***ual partners, this was the response of our local MP:
    "Rotherham MP Denis MacShane said he was shocked by the case and called for a drive to instill a better sense of personal responsibility in both children and their parents."

    Personal responsibility for children!?

    We were victim blaming then, and people are still doing it.

    Oh and another article for a seperate case illustrating the attitude of the towns folk to these girls.
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ant-again.html

    This girl got pregnant at 11 and then again at 14. Here's what the townsfolk had to say:
    "One neighbour on a council estate in Rotherham said: 'She is giving out the message that it's OK to keep getting pregnant and the state will just keep paying for it.'"

    Sorry, but anyone with their heads in the sand that these girls weren't being victim blamed by the white working class community has selective amnesia. Attitudes were very different.
    Looking at the link from the Mail. It was her mother that the animosity was aimed at. It looked like she would have to move to a different area.

    Police do nothing, council do nothing, mother let's it happen, townsfolk have a go at the mother. Sounds like they were pretty pissed off.

    What should they have done John? Obviously not report it to the police or social services as that wouldn't work. What is the next step? Report it to the Guardian?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,817
    Quote Originally Posted by Shark27 View Post
    Looking at the link from the Mail. It was her mother that the animosity was aimed at. It looked like she would have to move to a different area.

    Police do nothing, council do nothing, mother let's it happen, townsfolk have a go at the mother. Sounds like they were pretty pissed off.

    What should they have done John? Obviously not report it to the police or social services as that wouldn't work. What is the next step? Report it to the Guardian?
    "One neighbour on a council estate in Rotherham said: 'She is giving out the message that it's OK to keep getting pregnant and the state will just keep paying for it.'"

    That doesn't sound targeted at the mother. But even still, the poor mother had that girl at 14 herself, she's just another victim in a society that wasn't doing enough.

    I don't recall telling my parents about that one incident. But that's quite meaningless in the grand scheme of things when we literally knew children age 12 were having *** with 26-year-olds and the town's MP was saying the girl needed to learn a better sense of personal responsibility. I think that tells us everything about the attitude back then.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    I knew girls were getting referred to as "p*ki sh*ggers".

    I was trying to think back to any warning signs I was aware of at school. I remember one particular incident when I feel like in year 10 one of the girls had her older boyfriend come into the school grounds to collect her (Clifton Upper/ formerly Spurley Hey), its hard to remember in my head but I feel I was told he was about 26, and we were probably 14, it definitely seemed wrong to me, but also was just accepted. Looking back I'm surprised how brazen it was, but its also a long time ago.

    I don't think anyone at all was aware of the scale. We can only be judged on our reaction to the things we did know about, which the evidence shows involved an awful lot of victim blaming.
    Did you tell your mum and dad (earlier on in the thread you said that once the kids knew, inevitably their parents would know)?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    "One neighbour on a council estate in Rotherham said: 'She is giving out the message that it's OK to keep getting pregnant and the state will just keep paying for it.'"

    That doesn't sound targeted at the mother. But even still, the poor mother had that girl at 14 herself, she's just another victim in a society that wasn't doing enough.

    I don't recall telling my parents about that one incident. But that's quite meaningless in the grand scheme of things when we literally knew children age 12 were having *** with 26-year-olds and the town's MP was saying the girl needed to learn a better sense of personal responsibility. I think that tells us everything about the attitude back then.
    It's not meaningless. You said local parents would inevitably get to hear about it. Based on your own personal experiences it seems that you are wrong.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    10,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Shark27 View Post
    It's not meaningless. You said local parents would inevitably get to hear about it. Based on your own personal experiences it seems that you are wrong.
    If your local MP said the girl needed to learn a better sense of personal responsibility that should have rung alarm bells with the general public If you shark & the others you mentionesd earlier are now so concerned that you blamed Social Services the Council & the Pokice who were obviously culpable why werent you tearing down the doors of the Council House etc demanding action Did you or any of the others you mention write to the Authorities or your MP or Councillors I assume there would have been some Tory Councillors you could have expressed your indignance to
    There are in fact quite a few avenues you could have explored
    I think that collective responsibility is what John is referring to

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,626
    Quote Originally Posted by Exiletyke View Post
    If your local MP said the girl needed to learn a better sense of personal responsibility that should have rung alarm bells with the general public If you shark & the others you mentionesd earlier are now so concerned that you blamed Social Services the Council & the Pokice who were obviously culpable why werent you tearing down the doors of the Council House etc demanding action Did you or any of the others you mention write to the Authorities or your MP or Councillors I assume there would have been some Tory Councillors you could have expressed your indignance to
    There are in fact quite a few avenues you could have explored
    I think that collective responsibility is what John is referring to
    You sound and type like John.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    You sound and type like John.
    Yep, doppelgänger

    All this argument about a legal activity.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,634
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    You sound and type like John.
    Blimey. A few weeks ago, Grist was suggesting that John and I are the same person and Exile briefly picked it up and ran with it. I'm starting to wonder if there are only about three people posting on here, each with a stable of usernames with disparate views.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    10,287
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    Blimey. A few weeks ago, Grist was suggesting that John and I are the same person and Exile briefly picked it up and ran with it. I'm starting to wonder if there are only about three people posting on here, each with a stable of usernames with disparate views.
    You're quite right Kerr there was a very brief time that when I looked at your posts & looked at Johns there were certain similarities until I realised John did not puncuate his posts with either overt or covert digs
    I have realised that John is a far more intelligent poster than you will ever be because he is honest
    My apologies John for even thinking that you & Kerr could be the same person

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,232
    Wow, not been on this football forum for over 6 months or so. Thought I'd pop in to see what was happening. Have any of you actually stopped to look at yourselves? This is a kangaroo court. Get a life, people. Don't bother replying, I'll not be back.

Page 12 of 18 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •