Firstly, I fully get your gist, Hopey regarding youth game time & lack of it & rotation of the substitute options.
But consolation minutes is not the answer long term i'd say as well as my previous comments i made particularly in an important season like this one as results matter.
After comparing English Youth Academy set ups to Euro ones i'm persuaded to think the English quality of matches played at this level is the bigger issue & the quality of it presently.
Brentford, a Championship club at the time, closed their Category 2 academy in 2016 because a facility with running costs of around £1.5million a year then was not producing enough talent for the first team or making a profit through player sales.
Instead of pouring more money into the Academy they decided to pool their resources into setting up a B team, which would only focus on developing players between the ages of 17 & 21 who had a better chance of making an "immediate impact."
The inspiration behind the idea was for the club to “out-think” their competitors by straying away from English football’s Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP).
Even now the Brentford’s B team do not play in a league & the benefit of this is they can organise their own fixtures against Academy sides, non-League teams & European clubs including FC Nantes in France thus providing excellent quality matches weekly.
This gives players a better chance to progress in my opinion, against better strength opposition weekly.
The French Championnat National U19 is the equivalent of English L2 contested by 56 clubs that are split into 4 groups, so plenty of competitive game time for all squad players, plus an extra French Cup competition too & it provides the opportunity to play in UEFA U19 Youth League of which FC Nantes are regulars in.
Brentford relaunched a Category 4 Academy last July but their Community Sports Trust looks after an under-18s squad this season.
Maybe the "B squad" scenario is a better way to the first team & the matches i've seen are top class affairs with an interesting mix of differing tactics on show too with a more mature attitude shown on the pitch.
Whilst observing comments of folks who watch many Leeds youth fixtures & looking at the various age groups Youth League tables tells a story presently.
At U18 level Man U are top with a 100% record after 11 games followed by Man City in 3rd with Leeds 6th & Everton bottom of the North league presently.
At U21 Man U are 13th, Leeds 18th, Everton 23rd & Man City rock bottom with 6 points from 11 games !
Man U don't "develop players" as such as they go out trawling & buy the "young players" globally, of which most disappear never making it to their first team.
Man City U21s look very poor table position wise possibly cos they loan so many out to gain "quality game time" experience.
Maybe an English L3 should be set up with clubs B teams to compete similar to the French set up to benefit all players caught out in this "catch 22" seasonal round-about with emerging talented 18/21 year olds ?
Speaking to my brothers team friends of 18/21 years age bracket then 'quality regular 90 minutes' is what they want & are getting.
Just saying.