6/1 bar

[donsdaft]

Im going to try and explain this like Father Ted explained small cows to Father Dougal. Gender is a social/cultural construct. Therefor by its very definition, is fluid. It’s what goes on inside your brain. S€x is to do with biology. Your dangly bits, chromosomes n stuff

It’s when the top bit is out of synch with the rest, you’ve got a problem.

It's not me that's got the problem.

You are , of course, wrong about gender.

Male , Female, end of story.

I accept the possibility that folk feel female but they've got a cock and balls.

Shame.

Getting them cut off doesn't make them female though.

Pretending it does guarantees a Tory government in perpetuity, something I've been trying to explain to you for a long time now.

[Donanddusted]

As crap as the SNP may actually be in government (debate at your leisure), the Tories having free-rein to pursue their own agenda even if it isn't factually correct is a terrible lack of checks and balances that the BBC is only too happy to facilitate:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.t...dson-interview

[Mason89]

Putting aside the fact you’re completely wrong, how does a tiny minority of folk just trying to live out their life guarantee Tory governments? You’re going to have to show your working on that one.

[donsdaft]

C'mon, you know the answer to this one really.
In fact you may well look back at Tory governments as being centrist.

[Jupiter]

Why do some of you guys want the government to run everything? It would be an even bigger sh!tshow than what we have now.

Like most countries what we need is better politicians but I don't see thst happening anywhere.

[InversneckieDob]

Why do some of you guys want the government to run everything? It would be an even bigger sh!tshow than what we have now.

Because if the Government doesn't "run everything" or at least regulate to some extent the way the economy functions, you end up with self interested @rseholes setting the economic agenda.
Example, because of the Stagecoach monopoly in the Highlands, public transport is a sh1tshow. I refuse to believe any Government could run it worse.
But the "poor service/high prices" model works very well for those odious cu nts Gloag and Soutar.
So the government is happy because there is, nominally, service provision.
A proper Government would run things properly, allow the public not to rely on cars to the same extent and generally enjoy more flexibility.
But this would involve investment, which would involve the wealthy's disproportionately low rate of direct taxation being raised.
So it's obviously a bad idea when your ethos is "free market at any cost".

And tell me how provision of utilities could be any more of a sh1tshow than they presently are?

I don't think you will though, because you're too EDGY.

[Basingstokered]

Because if the Government doesn't "run everything" or at least regulate to some extent the way the economy functions, you end up with self interested @rseholes setting the economic agenda.
Example, because of the Stagecoach monopoly in the Highlands, public transport is a sh1tshow. I refuse to believe any Government could run it worse.
But the "poor service/high prices" model works very well for those odious cu nts Gloag and Soutar.
So the government is happy because there is, nominally, service provision.
A proper Government would run things properly, allow the public not to rely on cars to the same extent and generally enjoy more flexibility.
But this would involve investment, which would involve the wealthy's disproportionately low rate of direct taxation being raised.
So it's obviously a bad idea when your ethos is "free market at any cost".

And tell me how provision of utilities could be any more of a sh1tshow than they presently are?

I don't think you will though, because you're too EDGY.

They should get a good old fashioned socialist like Sadiq Khan into run the transport network. You can see it when you go to the NFL game as long as he’s received more bail out since he’s bankrupted TFL since he’s run it.

[donsdaft]

“A proper Government would run things properly”

See, there’s the problem.

My heart is with you Sneckie min but I’m afraid my head isn’t.

[Jupiter]

“A proper Government would run things properly”

.

That's like saying Mussolini made the trains run on time. Which he didn't really.

[Donanddusted]

A proper Government would run things properly, allow the public not to rely on cars to the same extent and generally enjoy more flexibility.

Like Norway, for instance?