|
| + Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
If what's happening in Portland spreads, the US is in big big trouble.
"A mob of antifa have descended on the home of Portland city council member Dan Ryan for voting against @JoAnnPDX’s amendment to defund police." They've also attacked a church that runs a shelter for the homeless.
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status...81011255042048
I suppose they are and always have been judge and jury, in that they print and show what they deem newsworthy. It's why you don't even have to lie to have a political bias. Bias by omission is one of the most effective methods, it's why you will probably never read anything about Antifa violence in the Guardian/NY Times and why you'll probably never hear about Trump's law and norm breaking on Fox News.
Regarding this particular speech, do they have an ethical obligation to show Trump bo matter what he's saying? Was he willing to take questions? Was he willing to do a rigorous interview about his claims of fraud? Probably not, on all counts.
Putin will be absolutely delighted by all this. His Russian bot farms have done excellent work in sowing seeds of division in both the US and the UK.
The amount of QAnon disinformation still doing the rounds on social media is frightening (not just for the presidential election) and continues to be shared thousands of times as FACT.
There is no evidence of election fraud, because there is no election fraud.
If it was that easy to fix the vote, you can bet your life savings that Trump would have done it in a heartbeat.
Nah, there's been SOME election fraud, it would be incredibly naïve to pretend otherwise. Enough to matter? We don't know.
On your 2nd point, Trump and his supporters have probably tried.
In the current climate of media, big tech and the American war machine desperate to see Trump go, who would be the most likely to get away with voting fraud?