Sturgeonland

[donsdaft]

More likely to vote for them than a bunch of corrupt poofter lovers.

[donsdaft]

Any suggestions because nobody sane is voting for the handsy Jambo mess & his squad of purple rinse toilet watchers

So what you’re saying is that there isn’t a independence supporting party worth voting for.

That was my point really, we need a new party.

Preferably led by Kate Forbes.

[Mason89]

More likely to vote for them than a bunch of corrupt poofter lovers.

I know you are, you’re a honking smooth brained bigot. Luckily, nobody really takes that party seriously

[donsdaft]

More than wants to see Scotland a poof’s paradice.

[InversneckieDob]

More than wants to see Scotland a poof’s paradice.

Once more, you're overdoing it.

[InversneckieDob]

So what you’re saying is that there isn’t a independence supporting party worth voting for.

That was my point really, we need a new party.

Preferably led by Kate Forbes.

The "Dinosaurs are a lie" coalition?

[donsdaft]

Don’t you actually talk to people?

She buggered it up with her pervert loving.
The party itself has finished themselves off by sheer stupidity.
The financial shenanigans are just the icing on the cake.

[InversneckieDob]

No I don't.

Most just won't vote until they have something to vote for.

They need another party to vote for, not this pile of shïte.

So, what would an independence party that would vote for look like?
And gies a cogent answer with using words and phrases like poofs and mannies canna be wifies etc.

The way I look at it, the SNP's policies in government are wholly irrelevant.

Post independence I'd image, fairly soon, the SNP would cease to exist.
I think the potential within an independent Scotland to, at the very least, not be governed by a "let the markets decide" mantra would be right there.

I think Kate Forbes' personal beliefs are pretty abhorrent but, on a single issue basis, I'd vote for the largest independence movement with a view to obtaining that outcome, were that party led by her.

Now, I understand floating voters, in terms of independence, being reticent about voting for a party with whose socio-political and socio-economic policies they disagree.

For the life of me I can't understand someone who espouses a belief in independence not voting SNP because of some here-today-gone-tomorrow policies.

[InversneckieDob]

Don’t you actually talk to people?

She buggered it up with her pervert loving.
The party itself has finished themselves off by sheer stupidity.
The financial shenanigans are just the icing on the cake.

I talk to people plenty.
Most people I talk to have a "live and let live" mentality and don't see gay andvtrans people as "perverts.
That mentality is the preserve of a special few.
In any event, see my comments about here-today-gone-tomorrow policies.

Are you really saying you can't put your personal beliefs in relation to some, pretty narrow, policies aside in the name of the greater good.

[donsdaft]

They weren't gone tomorrow though, were they?
They only get worse and worse.

I agree with almost everything you say in your original post but we are talking about deliberately alienating voters for no good reason while sitting on a 50/50 poll.

Bloody madness.

If the SNP were to maintain their position they had to vote for real change, they didn't.
I still can't get my head around 30% of party members not even voting.