The Corona Virus

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Morally wrong again Bt ,

I am a man with very "loose" morals army88. They are so loose, I make Blow Job Johnson look like a saint.

[Balanbam00]

WHO advisor slams his own organisation for its 'outrageous' COVID origins report saying scientists 'did NOTHING to consider the possibility the virus leaked from a Chinese lab' (Daily Mail)

'What they said is that they were given the task of examining the zoonotic [animals to people] origin of the pandemic. So in the framing of the task, a conclusion was already implicit,' he explained.

'And so that was why, according to them, they didn't have the mandate or the capacity or the skills or the team or the access to even investigate. And so you couldn't have a legitimate process without examining all of the hypotheses. They only examined some.'

Todays quality in leadership is not what you know ,but WHO you know?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

The spoof continues Balan.

[sinkov]

I like to keep abreast of the facts, the stats, which say that over 35 million doses of vaccine have been pumped into arms in the UK. We should be knowing by now it it's dangerous, so how many have died, or are suspected to have died so far, as a result of being vaxxed.

Does anyone know ?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Rough guesstimate sinkov...

3

Second rough guesstimate, people who have actually died entirely because of Covid-19...

10,000

[sinkov]

FOI request has discovered the number of people who died in Scottish hospitals over the last ten years, 2020 was the worst since.......2018. In fact only 2019 had fewer deaths than last year going back to 2010.

So what is going on, no doubt 2020 flu deaths being recorded as Covid is largely responsible, but whatever, last year was not a bad year in Scotland by any means, whatever the politicians and mad scientists might tell us. They're simply taking the piss.

https://www.gov.scot/publications/foi-202100150675/

[Norder]

.

this News has been out in digital media for some months....their psychological operations easily recognised (by those awake) - but only now, picked up on...by the mainstream.

The Telegraph.

State of fear: how ministers ‘used covert tactics’ to keep scared public at home

Government’s ‘psychological strategies’ to manipulate unwitting public’s behaviour may backfire and lead to long-term damage, experts claim

Failures in the UK’s pandemic response are not hard to identify, but on one front the Government’s success is undeniable: persuading a fearful nation to stay locked indoors for much of the past year.

The daily diet of statistics on deaths, hospitalisations and Covid cases has been so effective that compliance with lockdown has gone far beyond what ministers expected.




They are so concerned that the British public has been the subject of a mass experiment in the use of strategies that operate “below their level of awareness” that they have made a formal complaint to their professional body, which will now rule on whether government advisers have been guilty of a breach of ethics.

The Government, and its advisers, deny any such transgression, arguing that they have simply presented the public with the facts about the threat Covid poses, and what they need to do to stay safe.

One of the key pieces of evidence cited by those who have complained about “covert” tactics comes from a document prepared for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) at the beginning of the pandemic a year ago.

Dated March 22, the paper written by the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours stated: “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened; it could be that they are reassured by the low death rate in their demographic group, although levels of concern may be rising … the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat.”

The same document presented a grid of 14 options for increasing compliance which included “use media to increase sense of personal threat”, a tactic which was seen as having a “high” effectiveness though spill-over effects “could be negative”.

One regular Sage attendee said: “The British people have been subjected to an unevaluated psychological experiment without being told that is what’s happening.

“All of this is about trying to steer behaviour in the direction an elite has decided, rather than deciding if it is the right thing or the ethical thing to do.”

Gary Sidley, a retired NHS consultant clinical psychologist, said: “It’s as if there is a little industry around pandemic management and it excludes alternative voices.

“There is growing concern within my field about using fear and shame as a driver of behaviour change.”

Mr Sidley was so concerned that he and 46 colleagues wrote to the British Psychological Society (BPS) raising “concerns about the activities of government-employed psychologists … in their mission to gain the public’s mass compliance with the ongoing coronavirus restrictions”.

The letter added: “Our view is that the use of covert psychological strategies – that operate below the level of people’s awareness – to ‘nudge’ citizens to conform to a contentious and unprecedented public health policy raises profound ethical questions.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...scared-public/


..

[army88]

Rough guesstimate sinkov...

3

Second rough guesstimate, people who have actually died entirely because of Covid-19...

10,000

You really are losing it BT.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

First guess was 3 it turned out to be 7. Not bad for a guy who is losing it army88.

Second guess seems to be about right, even the government admit "underlying health issues" is claiming the bulk of the last twelve month's death toll and NOT singularly the Sav Covid virus. Remember when SAGE mad man Chris Whitty said the virus would only prove fatal for a "minority of those infected".

Not so much losing it, as refusing to follow the herd army88, eh?

Please read #1927.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Latest revelation: the simple truth is no-one in the scientific community knows how long the immunity to the Sars Covid virus from vaccinations lasts.

It is accepted the jab does not provide immunity from contacting the virus, but it is claimed a person will be less at risk of dying or hospitalisation from Covid should they wish to accept the risk of cerebral haemorrhaging following a vaccination.

The mad scientists of SAGE have not got a clue if any of the variants that have been reported in other parts of the world, including Brazil and South Africa, will thwart efforts to defeat the virus. It seems to me the men in the white coats are still wetting their finger, holding it up to the wind and hoping for the best.

I wonder what they will tell us next in their efforts to maintain the societal reset?