That's a shame GarlickBread. Unusually for me I found a lot of what you said I totally agreed with.
I'm not sure what got Alto's back up, but you trying to put sinkov right with empirical evidence is a complete waste of time. He's a former Accrington GSOB, and by heck they are always right!
g
Just on that BT, in the context of a currency that has been over 1.60, even 1.15 qualifies as 'around 1.10' imo, Garlick chose not to agree and went to great lengths, posting graph after graph after graph after graph in attempt to prove me wrong. Well he's entitled to do that and I'm often wrong, but I just couldn't be bothering with such pedantry, I've better things to do with my time than argue obscure points with obsessives like Garlick.
Anyway, it seems like Garlick has got this forum at each others throats, which always happens when posters like him are around, in fact it often seems their aim. It survived well enough before he arrived, it will survive well enough now he's gone, and it tells you all you need to know that he found it impossible to comply with a simple request to be polite and respectful of other poster's views. It takes some doing to get banned off this site, and while Garlick hasn't been banned, it seems he jumped before what he knew was the inevitable push arrived.
I love this board. I enjoy the hearing the various opinions being put forward, sometimes in a blunt, direct way.
I'm struggling to see why Garlick has been singled out amongst the lot of us - in my opinion there are posters on here who are much more aggressive than Garlick, but I am happy for them to have their two penneth.
Ask Garlick BT.
Whoops. That's not an option any more, is it?
Sorry Alto, I must have missed something.
I never saw anything that Garlick did which was as bad as some other stuff I have read on here.
What did I miss?
If it was the Drama Queen bit then all I can say is that you are hyper sensitive. I have been called worse but it really doesn't bother me at all.
Last edited by 1959_60; 04-08-2019 at 04:09 PM.