Originally Posted by
Kent Magpie
I could see the logic in replacing Jones and Crowley to be honest. At the time Nemane was playing right back and Jones as a wing. Clearly Maynard feels Nemane is a better defender than Jones (he is probably right...but neither are great). Robertson was supposed to be shielding the back 4 as it was by then, then you can take jones off bring Colkett on an have a marginally stronger defence. Then to strengthen the defence he brings on TAR.. he could have taken Austin off I guess, but it would have been marginal.
Personally I can see the logic in what he is trying to do, the side are low on confidence and it really showed . Unfortunately he has lost the fans and there is no coming back from that (as the idiot who seemed to want to fight everybody because Nemane wasn't taken off showed).