QPR's run of fixtures

[Rattea]

Oh dear you demonstrate what some have clicked on to but not you.

I have not expressed opinion just the raw facts ... its amazing how so many mistake them when its not what the want to hear!

[Sma11ytheRam]

Rattea... Please explain the error in my Math?? Do not ignore when your wrong. I will admit I'm wrong if you can prove me wrong with your FACTS.

QPR have played five games against top six sides. They have Lost three Drawn one and Won One. That's 4 points from 5 games from "top six" sides. Or 0.8 points per game. They are playing three of these teams in the next three games. Using your formula they are likely to get 2.4 points. Hence 2 to 3 points. Again using your "like for like" they are playing Derby, Burnley and Reading from which they have already taken 4 points.

Now am I wrong?

How ****ing arrogant and patronising do you have to be to start mentioning Mensa? As you made it personal, you are are the biggest knob head i have ever engaged with on message board. You fall below all the trolling Red dogs in my opinion. You abuse your position as a MOD as you wind people up with your WUM comments to the point of losing it with you, and then you ban them.

This is the last time I'm en

[Rapid]

Rattea... Do not ignore when your wrong..

mate. you've been reading this forum long enough to know this is exactly the rat's MO!

a lot of our exchanges end with the rat going to 'ignore mode'. you should be pleased with that result because that's when he knows he's wrong.

right roge/triz?

[Gift_of_the_Gabb]

Rattea... Do not ignore when your wrong..

mate. you've been reading this forum long enough to know this is exactly the rat's MO!

a lot of our exchanges end with the rat going to 'ignore mode'. you should be pleased with that result because that's when he knows he's wrong.

right roge/triz?[/quote]

Exactly the rat always does a runner when his agenda is exposed. Anyway enough of the self serving rodent.

Back on topic it looks QPR have are replacing Rhodes with Kevin Doyle. Not a good move for them. He had a good spell a few years back but has been poor for several seasons now.

QPR look a little toothless to me now and they certainly haven't been ripping up the league despite their riches. If we can get another good run of form together, I think we stand a chance of challenging them.

[Rattea]

Rattea... Do not ignore when your wrong..

mate. you've been reading this forum long enough to know this is exactly the rat's MO!

a lot of our exchanges end with the rat going to 'ignore mode'. you should be pleased with that result because that's when he knows he's wrong.

right roge/triz?[/quote]

Id love to know when I go into ignor mode ... might be when I'm away for a few days and no internet access? But never otherwise. As I have said before if you want to raise an old point bump the thread and bring my attention to it. Show me evidence of that?

[Rattea]

[quote="Sma11ytheRam"]Rattea... Please explain the error in my Math?? Do not ignore when your wrong. I will admit I'm wrong if you can prove me wrong with your FACTS.

QPR have played five games against top six sides. They have Lost three Drawn one and Won One. That's 4 points from 5 games from "top six" sides. Or 0.8 points per game. They are playing three of these teams in the next three games. Using your formula they are likely to get 2.4 points. Hence 2 to 3 points. Again using your "like for like" they are playing Derby, Burnley and Reading from which they have already taken 4 points.

Now am I wrong?

How ****ing arrogant and patronising do you have to be to start mentioning Mensa? As you made it personal, you are are the biggest knob head i have ever engaged with on message board. You fall below all the trolling Red dogs in my opinion. You abuse your position as a MOD as you wind people up with your WUM comments to the point of losing it with you, and

[triz]

your ignore mode rats is simply repeatedly not answering questions like you are with smalley now. You have said he cant grasp maths and yet i see no error in his maths and instead of telling him his error (which i suspect you cant) you skirt the subject and insult him with mensa jibes.Yes you have posted facts and smalley hasnt denied them as far as i can see, he has simply posted facts as well which counter your argument. Try engaging with him instead of going to your usual mode of posting when under the cosh.

[Rapid]

Rattea... Do not ignore when your wrong..

mate. you've been reading this forum long enough to know this is exactly the rat's MO!

a lot of our exchanges end with the rat going to 'ignore mode'. you should be pleased with that result because that's when he knows he's wrong.

right roge/triz?[/quote]

Id love to know when I go into ignor mode ... might be when I'm away for a few days and no internet access? But never otherwise. As I have said before if you want to raise an old point bump the thread and bring my attention to it. Show me evidence of that?[/quote]

brilliant. it's always just so convenient that you're on an international business trip consulting a sheik.

I see you make me the offer now we have no search function!

so lets try this one on for size - you say you didn't renew you ST this year because of how sam rush targete

[UpTheRams1884]

Oh dear...

[Rattea]

Rattea... Do not ignore when your wrong..

mate. you've been reading this forum long enough to know this is exactly the rat's MO!

a lot of our exchanges end with the rat going to 'ignore mode'. you should be pleased with that result because that's when he knows he's wrong.

right roge/triz?[/quote]

Id love to know when I go into ignor mode ... might be when I'm away for a few days and no internet access? But never otherwise. As I have said before if you want to raise an old point bump the thread and bring my attention to it. Show me evidence of that?[/quote]

brilliant. it's always just so convenient that you're on an international business trip consulting a sheik.

I see you make me the offer now we have no search function!

so lets try this one on for size - you say you didn't renew you S