Caroll - 3 match ban!

[palerider]

There's a tube strike next week for the Norwich game. The club should do all they can to postpone that until a later date which means AC misses Everton away. We're more likely to win against Norwich.

But that would make them admit we're a one-man team.

Tricky one.

[GARNETT]

If we cant beat Norwich at home without him were in f ucking trouble

[bonzosbest74]

Flores clearly cheated to make him react and unfortunately Carroll fell for the ruse. It was the only way the big girls blouse was going to get the better of Big Andy who had outplayed him all day. . . . . . .it may well prove very costly because BFS's system needs a big target man.


It was pathetic play acting and a harsh decision (probably a yellow for both players imo) but I can see why it was given at the time. I do think Carroll and the manager are as much to blame as Flores and the Ref though, we all knew before the game that he would cheat so we should have been prepared for it and not reacted.

We clearly have a bit of a discipline problem and Carroll, Sam & Nolan all need to make sure they remain calm & focused for the rest of the season.

[mrbubbles]

I am stumped by that decision they are all facking clowns and haven't got a clue

[castiron]

That has finally done it for me. Not just because it's one of ours, but because f uckers like Cheato are the ones who are backed!. The game of football as we know it has finally gone. It will/has become a non contact sport. I wish Carroll had spread the c unts nose across his face.

[frenchlion]

I didn't see the incident so can't really comment but Saturday during the France/England rugby match there was a little bit of "handbags" flying around and the ref asked for the video to see how it started and who was responsible. It didn't take all afternoon for him to take a decision and he told the guys concerned to stop f,ucking about and get on with the game...end of story. Why the f,uck can't the same method be introduced into football?

[JimmyV66]

Because frenchlion that would make far to much sense. The FA and sense do not and never have gone together.


Btw mate click the link below for a gif. of the incident. - view external link

[Warwick4370]

There is a link between Chico's reaction and AC's suspension, that I believe made it impossible for an informed decision to be made.

If Chiko had just held his forehead and been brave, as would be expected after a slap on the forehead, then AC's reaction would have shown if he had intent. If AC immediately apologised, then it would show it was accidental. If he just walked off, then it would show intent. The carry on by Chico meant that AC couldn't apologise, but would he have anyway?

I think AC is guilty. He did not immediately turn to check on Chico, the second it had happened. He did not change his facial expression after hitting him. There was no remorse on his face, as would be expected if he accidentally hit someone.

To overturn the FA would have to believe it was an accident, and perhaps the only one who really knows is AC himself, and I assume Chico would know too.

This may be a challenge too far for us now, but I agree with others that discipline and self control need t

[Simone]

It doesn't surprise me that the panel made their judgement against Carroll. But when I come into close proximity to Chico Flores on the 20th of this month I am going to tell him what a total t0sser he is! Fu(king tw@t!

[TICKER]

Flores,the F.A,Webb hang your head in shame,still it's west ham what did we expect...no balls,no common sense and no morals that sums up the not so beautiful game.