+ Visit Nottingham Forest FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    16,113

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Quote Originally Posted by "Elite_Pie", sounds familiar. Let's be honest, in his conceited head it's never his fault.[/quote


    While that's hard to disagree with, as a totally unbiased (!!) outsider, it seems to me you are letting your owner off lightly. No-one would be surprised to learn that Billy Davies had his own personal agenda, but is he the only one? You had to read between the lines a bit to work out that interference from Fawaz was the reason that McCarthy turned down the job, but Warnock made it much clearer. It's blatantly obvious that your first choice managerial appointments are being missed because of Fawaz and the involvement he wants to have in playing matters.

    Are you all happy with this?
    Have to agree with this.

    You'd have to be an idiot not to realise that Davies can start an argument in a broom cupboard and will fall out with owners eventually by tryin

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    215

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    [quote="Sir_Brian_Clough"]Hi fellow Forest fans and fans of opposing teams who are revelling in our present issues.

    I wanted to offer up the truth about what has happened over the last 6-8 weeks which has led us to this horrible position we find ourselves in (and I am not talking about being just 2 points off the playoffs).

    About 8 weeks ago, Billy put a list of players together for loans. To say they were unrealistic targets is a very large understatement. One on the list was Javier Hernandez of Manchester United. Another was Lee Cattermole. That should give you an indication of how ridiculous the list was. True to his word, Fawaz approached no less than 12 clubs enquiring about players and not a single club gave permission to speak to the players' representatives. As results began to slip, Billy was asked what was going wrong and he repeatedly stated to Fawaz that if he had been successful with those players, we would be challenging for 2nd place

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7,399

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourne1865
    The only thing that bothers me is Warnock and why he turned it down? Was he alleging that he wouldn't have full control or something.

    " Fawaz insisted he played Abdoun and Djebbour in the game against Derby "


    As a guess i would say yes

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,838

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Quote Originally Posted by "Ramondo", sounds familiar. Let's be honest, in his conceited head it's never his fault.[/quote


    While that's hard to disagree with, as a totally unbiased (!!) outsider, it seems to me you are letting your owner off lightly. No-one would be surprised to learn that Billy Davies had his own personal agenda, but is he the only one? You had to read between the lines a bit to work out that interference from Fawaz was the reason that McCarthy turned down the job, but Warnock made it much clearer. It's blatantly obvious that your first choice managerial appointments are being missed because of Fawaz and the involvement he wants to have in playing matters.

    Are you all happy with this?

    Finally, if Billy was going to be sacked after the Derby game regardless of the result, then finding a replacement wasn't ve

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,210

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    I'm not necessarily saying you're full of ****, but anybody could write that piece after collecting various 'itk' rumours through the forums or twitter.

    Interesting read though.

    However I do love the sheep and their sadpie mates saying "excellent post" though trying to stir the pot. I suppose it takes away the focus of your own promotion bottle job and impending relegation.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    853

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Although I'm very much Black and White, I do have some knowledge that I should share, let's just say that I am party to information direct from the lips of the ginger toucan.

    If I recall the story correctly, one of the Africans was subbed at Bolton?, he cried straight to your Kuwaiti head honcho who took it upon himself to have it out with Krankie in the dressing room at HT. The pint sized scot told him to stick it where the sun don't shine and relationship irretrievable from there on in. Nasty little Jock then does what he does best and ****s you all over.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Quote Originally Posted by garibaldi
    I do love the sheep and their sadpie mates saying "excellent post" though trying to stir the pot.

    Reading back, four people have praised the original post. One derby fan, One Notts fan, and two Forest fans.

    Still, don't let facts get in the way of your little strop.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    853

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Oh and I forgot to mention, Krankie pay off allegedly exceeds 3.2m. Blimey, ain't that two Chris Gunters?.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    812

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    My mate reckons Dean Saunders is on is way, mind you he knows **** all...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    849

    re: The Truth About Billy's Sacking

    Well SBC seems you've caused quite a stir!

    Since you corroborated my post a few months back about Hendo going AWOL before that game which I knew to be a fact I believe that you have genuine inside info. So thank you for sharing.

    I would be interested to know more about the signing of Rafik as its all very well Fawaz saying that he doesn't interfere but there is no way in hell that BD would have sought him.

    We must not forget that Fawaz has already put a lot of money in to the club and continues to do so. Why should a manager be allowed to come in and spend millions of the owners money without him having a say.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •