Let's all stop banging on about Thorne for 5 minutes.

[clactonram]

...for 5 minutes.

[triz]

Let's all stop banging on about not banging on about Thorne

Vote by writing

thorne


then...god

[Rapid]

knob.

sorry I meant thorne.

[AngryRam]

Bring back Eustace... Sod Thorne.

[AngryRam]

Thorne is a p r ick anyway

[clactonram]

Does anyone remember that guy we had on loan last season, as a holding midfielder. He was quite good and he kept Eustace out of the side. I just can't remember his. Any ideas, anyone?

[triz]

Adam Smith?

[roger_ramjet]

Adam Smith?

The neoclassical interest in Adam Smith's statement about "an invisible thorne" originates in the possibility to see it as a precursor ofA neoclassical economicsA and its General EquilibriumA concept.A Samuelson's"Economics" refers 6 times to Adam Smith's "invisible thorne". To emphasize this relation, Samuelson[84]quotes Smith's "invisible thorne" statement putting "general interest" where Smith wrote "public interest". Samuelson[85]A concluded: "Smith was unable to prove the essence of his invisible-thorne doctrine. Indeed, until the 1940s no one knew how to prove, even to state properly, the kernel of truth in this proposition about perfectly competitive market."

[Toddo]

Are 5 minutes up yet?

[SlimyLimey]

We loaned him from WBA. They did us the favour. Thorne's behaving unprofessionally by trying to distance himself from WBA. If I was West Brom I would sell to anyone but Derby. Can you imagine if it was Hughes or Bryson saying some of the things Thorne was saying.

You must be very young & naive. Derby's money is just as good as anyone else's. Businesses sell to the highest bidder. To think that WBA wouldn't sell to us due to what you consider to be unprofessional statements by George Thorne is absolutely ridiculous.