the obvious question this weekend

[spameater1]

The bun media latest recruits

Neil Lennon & Kenny Dalglish

Welcome aboard brothers

Wee Neily and King Kenny are ma new best pals.

[happytim]

bluek is like the wee schoolkid who when he hears something he dosent like, sticks his fingers in his ears shouts im no listening and runs away.

if he really thought objectively about the rangers/sevco situation he would have to deal with uncomfortable situations and facts he would have to discuss.

thats why he has no debating skills on here on this subject, and offers absolutely nothing regarding how he can suggest that rangers are indeed the same club.

hes all soundbites, empty retaliation with no basis for any debate/discussion or argument.

go on bluek, i challenge you, if you really beleive rangers to be the same club why cant you answer or make any reference to all the many points brought up by the many posters on here telling you differently.

[bluek]

Debating skills with you?

Listen reve, You might want to spend your time and energy chasing yer tail over a football club that you don't even follow mind, but I'm not interested in joining you.

Believe what you want. I couldn't give a flying phuck

[AguyIknow]

Could be wrong but I don't think Dalglish or Lennon or any of the rest of them really care what The Rangers are using as a title (lower league ;-) ) these days. The fact is that there's a club with a huge support from Glasgow in a competition with Celtic and as such will bring a huge derby atmosphere to the game. Such an atmosphere and resultant bragging rights that have been missing since RFC went out of business.

In my humble opinion they are NOT the same club, but they do seem to have the vast majority of the same fans and play at the same stadium with similar colours to RFC.

That may be enough to ease the concerns of many of their support who wish to claim that they are the exact same club, but of course if they were the exact same club then they would have the exact same debts and creditors. And on the upside, they'd be entitled to prize money and transfer fees acruing to RFC. None of these occured though. Funny that

[happytim]

and so bluek proves my point.

i and others have given him many opportunity to debate, but he cant.

ps if rangers were the exact same club, they would not have had to let so many players walk away for nought. if those players walked away for nought cos they were contracted to the club that liquidated then would that not be proof of 3rd party ownership, cos they would need to be contracted to the club as well and registered with the spl.

[imtheboy]

I will debate with anyone at any time and provide ample evidence that Rangers FC is the same entity it always was.

[AguyIknow]

I will debate with anyone at any time and provide ample evidence that Rangers FC is the same entity it always was.

Can you tell us why Sevco didn't receive the prize money that was due to Rangers FC? Or why players on Rangers books were allowed to walk away without any money acruing to Rangers or to Sevco/The Rangers?
Or why the tax bill and debts to various supplliers run up by Rangers wasn't paid by Sevco/The Rangers?

[happytim]

or can you explain that if the company bought the assets, then the club wouldnt own any assets and instead be nothing, how does that work.

[imtheboy]

Sorry, forgot to add that doesn't include one trick ponies with transparent agendas.

I do apologise for getting you excited.

And that.