Bad News

[DeezAreGood]

"Shares in Aim-quoted Rangers International Football Club were cancelled (today) after it failed to find a nominated stock market adviser or nomad to replace WH Ireland, which quit a month ago.

So shares cancelled on AIM today, yet according to super_erse, they're already trading on a new exchange. Some amount of shyte fae him recently :/

[bluek]

The same Dave King that was a director of Oldco Rangers which was humiliated and liquidated.

Naw, it's Date King. Did you not read bluek's post?[/quote]



Phuckin predictive texting

[John65]

The court of session have granted Date King permission to become a director of Rangers.

It's all going wrong. What have we done.

You've happily installed another dishonest crook at the helm of your football club/company/whatever. That is what you've done.
Time will tell if having a deceitful individual as the face of The rangers is a good move or not.
Still, as was pointed out elsewhere, you lot couldn't care less if the devil himself was sat in the big chair, as long as the results on the pitch were going your way.
Which is why, incidentally, you ended up getting liquidated in the first place...

[bluek]

how should I react to that John. Post an angry tirade or calm down and stop making a fuss cos it's only a messageboard

Only in the twisted mind of the yahoo does it not matter what the law of the land decides, unless it's to phuck Rangers of course

[soup-herb]

I just really really hope all those huun f*cks with their Engerlund tops on are hurting

A kick -in lasts a few days but this is priceless.

karma is a wonderful thing

[John65]

how should I react to that John. Post an angry tirade or calm down and stop making a fuss cos it's only a messageboard

Only in the twisted mind of the yahoo does it not matter what the law of the land decides, unless it's to phuck Rangers of course

Nothing to do with the law of the land ffs.
The man is a crook.
If you are happy to have a man of his character leading your organisation, then batter in.
Here's a novel thought for you - why don't you, just once, actually give YOUR opinion, and not the fkn party line you all trot out even though everyone knows it's complete baws.
Do you believe that having a tax-dodger in charge of your club is a good idea?

(You'rew allowed to say you don't give a fk as long as he pumps his 'off the radar wealth' into the club, if that's what you think...)

[bluek]

You're confusing me with somebody else. No sure why because I don't change monikers or post under different usernames.


The man has settled his dispute with the SA authorities.

The law courts here have no issue with him becoming a director of Rangers.

As long as he does what he says he will do then I am content with him to be in charge.

Whether you think that's the party line or not really is irrelevant to me.

[AguyIknow]

1) The man has settled his dispute with the SA authorities.

2) The law courts here have no issue with him becoming a director of Rangers.

3) As long as he does what he says he will do then I am content with him to be in charge.

1 Having been caught and successfully prosecuted for carrying out multiple fraud he has settled in much the way anyone who is guilty and paid the fine has.

2 The Law courts similarly had no issue with David Murray, Craig Whyte, Charles Green etc becoming directors of Rangers - one wonders if in hind sight you think each of those was "fit and proper"

3 "As long as he does what he says he will do" - given that he's been described by a judge as being a "glib and shameless liar", and he's already misled major shareholders, not to mention joe public, about a nomad, don't you think you're being a tad naive giving him the benefit of the doubt?

Still - it's the latest version of the club you support so fi

[John65]

You're confusing me with somebody else. No sure why because I don't change monikers or post under different usernames.

You're right - I was confusing you with someone who would give an honest opinion when asked.

The man has settled his dispute with the SA authorities.

The law courts here have no issue with him becoming a director of Rangers.

As long as he does what he says he will do then I am content with him to be in charge.

Whether you think that's the party line or not really is irrelevant to me.

As I thought.

[DeezAreGood]

The SFA will have to break their rules to appoint King, as they did when they allowed Sevco a temporary membership so they could fulfil a diddy fixture against Brechin in 2012. How many other clubs who restructure their company set-up have had to wait 3 months to get a membership of the SFA? Answer - none.