WELL SHES NOW SAYING THAT SHE DID NOT WANT PATTISON TO ENDORSE HER AND IS EMBARASSED THAT HE DID AND WILL BE HAVING HIM EXPLAIN WHAT EXACTLY HIS DIRECTOR OF FOOTBALL POSITION ACTUALLY ENTAILS
Moorlad, 3 little words in your post explain why the opening post was a waste of time i.e. 'PATTISON ENDORSING HER'. Would you go in guns blazing shouting for the head of the person who actually played a big part in you getting the post, I think not.
WELL SHES NOW SAYING THAT SHE DID NOT WANT PATTISON TO ENDORSE HER AND IS EMBARASSED THAT HE DID AND WILL BE HAVING HIM EXPLAIN WHAT EXACTLY HIS DIRECTOR OF FOOTBALL POSITION ACTUALLY ENTAILS
SPAM MY ARSE
IF THE MEDIA DEPT WERE RECIEVING SPAM MESSAGES ON THAT SCALE THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SOMTHING ABOUT IT A LONG TIME AGO
ANDY HALL MIGHT BE A LOT OF THINGS BUT I.M SURE HES CAPABLE OF FITTING A FILTER TO THE MEDIA DEPTS E.MAIL ACCOUNT.
TOOK ME ABOUT 10 MINS TO SET MINE UP I NOW NO LONGER RECIEVE A SINGLE E.MAIL FROM ANYONE I DONT WISH TO. I GET THE ODD PRIVATE ONE THE SYSTEM FLASHES UP AS SOMTHING I MAY LIKE TO LOOK AT
The whole thing was a swizz from the offset.
To show our disdain we should have voted a real live Donkey into the position to show the owners that we take the role as seriously as they do, would have made good national media coverage too.
Maybe the billionaire could lend us one of their Camels for the role?
Quite telling that a whole thread on the subject has now disappeard off of the the Trust board.
Just who can you trust nowadays?
Nah, apparently it is just being 'cleaned up'.
Maybe we are being a bit harsh on Claire as nobody on the other board appears to have a bad word to say about her.
There were some people who questioned her credibility but maybe it was me 'thinking' I seen the posts or the people who posted them changed their minds and deleted them.
Can finally log in on this site again.
If you can't have a proper debate without threads disappearing because they don't like then maybe I'll have to find somewhere else to post.
The fans position, no they was no way I wanted it otherwise the application would of been serious.
I've proved along with others what's going on in terms of Stories loans, lapping, agar, blue yonder and others yet from the same posters giving digs and believing none despite glaring proof.
Regarding this farce of a result I predicted Claire Would win. I can't bend spoons so no psychic ability it was just piecing bits and bobs together.
Now it's not Suzanne Kids fault as she ain't to know and yes the emails were spam. But having checked it's a spambot site where you can create your own subject and will randomise email addresses and fire it out. I'm not saying Claire has cheated I'm saying it's highly suspicious and with the other suspicious activity and coincidental things being proved right then
Let us not forget that there are other people out there hoping to hang onto Claires tattered, tarnished and scandal smelling coat tails and hoping to get the gig next year.
If the other board slag her off then how will Deano get his 'Q&A sticky' with his questions to her.
He needs to grow a pair and realise he is running a forum and ridicule this lot.
You're very welcome Mullen; I'm glad that you've resolved yout log-on issues. Others can too....
Good to see you on here Mullen, and sad to know you won't be going to any more matches.
As I've said on the other board a number of times, a lot of what you had figured out I had heard already from a number of sources, including Barry (The Northern Soul) on here. As you know, I refused to even vote in that, so called, election to the board. Not because I thought it was rigged, or that any of the candidates were cheating, or even that not everyone was included in the ballot. I just thought it was a pointless position, which was designed to specifically keep fans from finding anything out, and to keep the heat off the main players.
I have massive problems with all sorts of things with the club, and have mentioned a lot of them over there, the trouble is that is a don't rock the boat kind of board, and with Deano now on the trust board, he can't afford to rock the boat at all. In fairness to him, he doesn't remove many of my posts, but I word them in such a way that they can't b