Reply With QuoteIm presuming Allardyce has changed his tactics .
6-2 defeat yet more shots than Everton. Work those stats out Saxo.
On your stats based analysis Saxo Sunderland should have won
Hall Of Fame
The other week when I was reading the BRFC's forum, a dummy posterd TeamGB-11 reminded me of Saxo (talks crap and the other posters think that he's an idiot) and this thread confirms that Saxo is TeamGB-11.
Spreading idiocy across the internet, well done.
Hall Of Fame
Im presuming Allardyce has changed his tactics .
6-2 defeat yet more shots than Everton. Work those stats out Saxo.
On your stats based analysis Saxo Sunderland should have won
Hall Of Fame
Bugger off 'blooboy'..Originally Posted by Howie5o
Im presuming Allardyce has changed his tactics .
6-2 defeat yet more shots than Everton. Work those stats out Saxo.
On your stats based analysis Saxo Sunderland should have won
Hall Of Fame
Why would you read brfcc nelstan?
Hall Of Fame
Mary is truly a CNT yet again, so predictable
Hall Of Fame
Saxo, the tactic is to stop the opposition getting into the last 22 or so yards, happy to let them shoot from beyond that, top keeper who will only be beaten a couple of times a season from that range, like the worldy Rotherham scored.
Hall Of Fame
"58% poss, 11 shots and 13 corners for an away side is dominant. Should have got something there.."
58% possession doesn't mean much when most of that is in your own third of the field, because you can't get out of it.
11 shots doesn't mean much when over half of them are long range efforts from well outside the box, done in desperation.
13 corners doesn't mean much when the defence is preventing you getting your crosses in in the first place, and then dealing with every one of those 13 corners.
Stats don't mean much, they rarely tell you the truth about a game.
Hall Of Fame
[quote="masher50"
58% possession doesn't mean much when most of that is in your own third of the field, because you can't get out of it.
11 shots doesn't mean much when over half of them are long range efforts from well outside the box, done in desperation.
13 corners doesn't mean much when the defence is preventing you getting your crosses in in the first place, and then dealing with every one of those 13 corners.
Stats don't mean much, they rarely tell you the truth about a game. [/quote]
In fairness, having read up on it on burnleymad, I realise that now. Deceptive though, sounds like hudds dominated!
Hall Of Fame
Saxo( with his many usernames ) is also the idiot on the lancs telegraph page with multiple usernames constantly crying on about stats. Least when he is spying on family members through the keyhole he is saving everyone else from seeing his drivel.
Hall Of Fame
You have no idea how much I'd like to smack your head in..
Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.
Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!
Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.
Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you
The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.
So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!
(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)
Posting Permissions