Squad Reduction

[paulo570]

Hadley and rowden......sounds more like a firm of solicitors !!

What about the likes of mason Bennett?...is he still on loan?

[BaaLocks]

Im guessing this is another Rat alias given the inconceivable spellings. Stig = Stig of the Dump; dumps traditionally home to Rats?

He posts under a pen? Tell me you're joking! How utterly, utterly sad if it is true.

[roger_ramjet]

Several I am led to believe

[BaaLocks]

Several I am led to believe

Are you one of them?

[fedupwitwk]

All clubs have at some point got rid of players and bought players before a new manager is appointed - most of the players listed are on the Fringe or beyond that, so clubs lose them to improve the new managers budgets. Mel can pay 3million for a player and give him away if he wants to as it's his money

[RamBamFan]

I'd get rid of the following:

Grant - Dodgy as hell, wages are probably a bit and think Mitchell or Roos can provide enough cover.
Baird - Don't see any point in him. He provides cover but when he does play he's poor.
Shotton - S***
Buxton - Think he's had his day bless him. I'd like him to go and do well elsewhere.
Albentosa - Clearly hasn't settled
Hanson (on loan) - Not good enough for the first team. Needs some experience lower down before he's good enough at this level.
Bryson - I know, I know. But I think we have too many centre midfielders. Hughes, Hendrick and JB all have potential. Johnson has something to prove.
Camara - Something has obviously cracked off here. May as well get rid of him if he's going to cease to exist. I'd like to give him a chance but I'm not sure that's going to happen.
Bent - For how much he's probably costing us in wages, I don't think it's reflecting in how much we're getting back.

[thederbyram]

I'd get rid of the following:

Grant - Dodgy as hell, wages are probably a bit and think Mitchell or Roos can provide enough cover.
Baird - Don't see any point in him. He provides cover but when he does play he's poor.
Shotton - S***
Buxton - Think he's had his day bless him. I'd like him to go and do well elsewhere.
Albentosa - Clearly hasn't settled
Hanson (on loan) - Not good enough for the first team. Needs some experience lower down before he's good enough at this level.
Bryson - I know, I know. But I think we have too many centre midfielders. Hughes, Hendrick and JB all have potential. Johnson has something to prove.
Camara - Something has obviously cracked off here. May as well get rid of him if he's going to cease to exist. I'd like to give him a chance but I'm not sure that's going to happen.
Bent - For how much he's probably costing us in wages, I don't think it's reflecting in how much we're getting back.

Swap

[BaaLocks]

Camara is a really interesting one for me, he's looked threatening when on and his YouTube videos show that he has something. We also paid more than a million for him and he is an international (OK Guinea but still). I find it really strange he hasn't been given a run, especially when we have had players who could have a nap in the centre circle and still get picked the next week.

[swaledale]

Several I am led to believe

Surely not? The mystic meg of DCM???

[paulo570]

I'd get rid of the following:

Grant - Dodgy as hell, wages are probably a bit and think Mitchell or Roos can provide enough cover.
Baird - Don't see any point in him. He provides cover but when he does play he's poor.
Shotton - S***
Buxton - Think he's had his day bless him. I'd like him to go and do well elsewhere.
Albentosa - Clearly hasn't settled
Hanson (on loan) - Not good enough for the first team. Needs some experience lower down before he's good enough at this level.
Bryson - I know, I know. But I think we have too many centre midfielders. Hughes, Hendrick and JB all have potential. Johnson has something to prove.
Camara - Something has obviously cracked off here. May as well get rid of him if he's going to cease to exist. I'd like to give him a chance but I'm not sure that's going to happen.
Bent - For how much he's probably costing us in wages, I don't think it's reflecting in how much we're getting back.

Not w