Inclusive club, open to all (except those we disagree with)

[JackSnakes]

Snake doesn't want to talk about it cos we’ve talked about it before.

StewartyIQ27 thinks someone is “sub-human” because he doesn’t agree with their views.

There we have it folks, that’s what we’re up against.

What you're up against, you complete d1ck, is people who don't want to rehash old stories and duplicate threads. The idiot who isn't fond of Bitton had already been covered in a thread about erseholes and their stupid prejudices. Surprised you didn't feature in that one since, if we are completely honest, you're an stupid prejudiced ersehole...

[AguyIknow]

FFS can everybody just give over calling other people "sub human"? Whether we like them or not, agree with them or not, support the same team as them or not, every person is de facto a human being and is NOT "sub human".

People who use the term "sub human" are echoing n@zis who used the term to try cover up their mass killings as though the killing of what they termed "sub humans" wasn't really akin to the killing of real people. It was. And tw@ts trying to be clever by calling anyone "sub-human" needs a kick in the haw maws!

[Mook1]

FFS can everybody just give over calling other people "sub human"? Whether we like them or not, agree with them or not, support the same team as them or not, every person is de facto a human being and is NOT "sub human".

People who use the term "sub human" are echoing n@zis who used the term to try cover up their mass killings as though the killing of what they termed "sub humans" wasn't really akin to the killing of real people. It was. And tw@ts trying to be clever by calling anyone "sub-human" needs a kick in the haw maws!

What about Kermit the Frog?

[AguyIknow]

I blame the pools

[Mook1]

It isn't easy being green.

[JackSnakes]

FFS can everybody just give over calling other people "sub human"? Whether we like them or not, agree with them or not, support the same team as them or not, every person is de facto a human being and is NOT "sub human".

People who use the term "sub human" are echoing n@zis who used the term to try cover up their mass killings as though the killing of what they termed "sub humans" wasn't really akin to the killing of real people. It was. And tw@ts trying to be clever by calling anyone "sub-human" needs a kick in the haw maws!

Hmm... Not really anything to do with nazis. The term has been in use for some time prior to the rise of German national socialism I believe...



Jist sayin like...

[Taintedice]

Correct, jack. Huns existed long before Ad0lf.

[AguyIknow]

Hmm... Not really anything to do with nazis. The term has been in use for some time prior to the rise of German national socialism I believe...



Jist sayin like...

Have a read of what i wrote - I don't recall saying they invented the term. Technically I think it may have an anthropological origin - just that they tried to dehumanise their victims by pretending that they were "sub human" - which neither they, nor anyone else alive is.

In use on this message board it's a malign term with a disgusting intent.

[JackSnakes]

Have a read of what i wrote - I don't recall saying they invented the term. Technically I think it may have an anthropological origin - just that they tried to dehumanise their victims by pretending that they were "sub human" - which neither they, nor anyone else alive is.

In use on this message board it's a malign term with a disgusting intent.

Again, I beg to differ.
Its use on this board is in keeping with its general use. Yes, it is derogatory but usually refers to those whose attitudes are considered less than compassionate or not in keeping with the generally accepted norms. It does NOT mean that such people are not human beings - in fact, that is so far off target it's almost coming back to hit you in the erse.
The term may rip your knitting but that is only because you are reading too much into it.
Chillax man...

[AguyIknow]

Again, I beg to differ.
Its use on this board is in keeping with its general use. Yes, it is derogatory but usually refers to those whose attitudes are considered less than compassionate or not in keeping with the generally accepted norms. It does NOT mean that such people are not human beings - in fact, that is so far off target it's almost coming back to hit you in the erse.
The term may rip your knitting but that is only because you are reading too much into it.
Chillax man...

Someone who's lower on compassion is referred to by more compassionate people as "sub human"?? Either you're on the wind up or you haven't the first clue what compassion even means