Attn The FA

[1959_60]

Agree Sinkov, not JUST to us, but all the decisions above have gone against us this season, and I can't think of one debatable decision that has gone our way. It gets to the stage where you start asking serious questions. How many points has it cost us?

Silva v City, 0-0 at the time
Ramsey v Arsenal 0-0 at the time
Barnes v Watford - we won this one, but...
Murray v Brighton, thank goodness he missed... but Tarks misses 3 crucial games because the powers that be spotted THAT one.
Wood v Brighton - goal should have stood.

[Altobelli]

It's not just the FA, it's their effing useless agents on out the field of play, and they're at it again tonight at Goodison. Mason Holgate flicks the ball away from Dyer, Dyer decides to 'go to ground'. Jon Moss gives Swansea a free kick and Holgate a yellow card. Absolutely fecking clueless, it happens game after game and not just to us.

MOTD gives your post a positive Sinkov, it looked like the Goons show rather than MOTD, they and the FA are not fit for purpose

[sinkov]

On it goes, the idiot Moss has now given Everton a pen for a foul that wasn't even close to being in the area.

[sinkov]

Agree Sinkov, not JUST to us, but all the decisions above have gone against us this season, and I can't think of one debatable decision that has gone our way. It gets to the stage where you start asking serious questions. How many points has it cost us?

Silva v City, 0-0 at the time
Ramsey v Arsenal 0-0 at the time
Barnes v Watford - we won this one, but...
Murray v Brighton, thank goodness he missed... but Tarks misses 3 crucial games because the powers that be spotted THAT one.
Wood v Brighton - goal should have stood.

I know the decisions ARE going against us BT, but I don't believe there's a conspiracy or anything. These decisions are 50/50 they either go for you or they don't, as someone who bets on the gee gees and has spent a fair bit of time in casinos, I know the sequence of even money chances that can go against you is frightening. Referees are clueless w@nkers but I don't believe they have it in for us. Give it a few more months though, and if the next 3/4 go against us, then alarm bells might well be ringing with me as well.

[1959_60]

Well, I've reached that stage already Sinkov.

Hypothetically speaking, if you were a suit at the FA with all that dosh to dole out, which teams would you prefer were not in the Prem?

I would say Burnley, Huddersfield and Swansea would be mine. Especially Burnley, because they are currently making a mockery of not re-cycling the money which is being given them, but they continue to defy the laws of big business.

The FA would absolutely hate it if we broke up the "Big Six" cartel, and do it on the cheap.

And I thought YOU were the cynical one?

[Norder]

.

not a done decision - yet.

Tarkowski has until 6pm on Tuesday to respond.

A panel of three former elite match officials assess off-the-ball incidents which are not seen at the time.

For retrospective action to be taken, and an FA charge to follow, the decision of the panel must be unanimous.

http://www.skysports.com/football/ne...-brighton-draw

...lets see what he has to say about it.

[oldcolner]

Hope he gets Ben Stoke’s lawyer involved fast. His video looked very bad but still nothing.

[1959_60]

If he does appeal, does anyone know when the panel will consider it? We could really do to have him available for the Spurs/Man Utd games - at least.

[Supersub6]

Should be all done and dusted this week, if things progress as normal.

[oldcolner]

Sinkov
Another one result 1-1
Burnley felt they should have had the chance to equalise from the penalty spot after Hammers keeper Hart caught Wood without appearing to make contact with the ball.