+ Visit West Bromwich Albion FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43

Thread: Why The F*ck Is Boris Having To Self Isolate Again?

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Baggiemadguern View Post
    I am so glad there are like minded people out there.

    Great posts Old Throstle and TipperaryBaggie.
    Yes some great posts. I too despair of the 'experts' on here who think they have all the answers when they know nothing.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    25,448
    Quote Originally Posted by OldThrostle View Post
    Before you get too dismissive of the numbers:

    Firstly, it's 0.07%, not 0.0007%

    Secondly, virtually all the Covid-related deaths have been of people aged 45 and over, so the 50,000 is out of a population of about 40 million not 65, so about 0.12%

    To put this into context: Picture yourself sitting at The Shrine on a normal match day before all this happened. You can see about 25,000 fans packed in there. Statistically, 30 of the people you could see will have already died of the virus, and the number is still rising.

    So yes, I've thought about it. From where I'm sitting, as a member of the "extremely vulnerable" category, it looks anything but insignificant.

    Just saying.
    It’s convenient to change the size of the U.K. population to suit you’re narrative, the fact is that the population stood at 66.65 million as of 2019.

    I accept your figure was correct at 0.7%......too many zeros in my bad maths!

    You quote that 30 people from an average 25,000 Albion home crowd would’ve died from Covid but I’d contend that most of those would’ve died from something else over the same period.

    The median death rate for the last 10 months is up a chunk from last year but it’s nonsense to suggest all 25,000 in the crowd would’ve been immune to death if Covid didn’t exist.

    My point was more about the Boris self isolation aspect.

    If you think about this logically you could end up in almost permanent isolation.

    You do your two weeks and each time you complete it you’re unlucky enough to be in contact with someone who tests positive for it the very next day!

    I would’ve thought that by now some trials would’ve been done to see if people who have had Covid like Boris Can then still be a carrier having come into contact with someone testing positive?

    To me that’s not rocket science but a legitimate scientific test programme to set up.

    It’s not about me or others “knowing better” and the pomposity of others on here who are decrying “armchair doctors”.......I’m not for a minute saying that I do know better.

  3. #13
    This is all too convenient in my opinion. He's isolated so can't be asked about the Cummings fiasco, and we are expecting a big announcement on Brexit very soon. Maybe he hasn't got a fridge big enough to hide in, at No 10?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    25,448
    Quote Originally Posted by Titchfieldbaggie View Post
    This is all too convenient in my opinion. He's isolated so can't be asked about the Cummings fiasco, and we are expecting a big announcement on Brexit very soon. Maybe he hasn't got a fridge big enough to hide in, at No 10?
    The bloke can’t win whatever he does.

    People have been moaning about Cummings all year and even Spitting Image ( which is very funny on this one by the way ) has lampooned him and made it seem like Cummings could even eat baby Wilf and not get sacked 😆

    I’m looking forward to hearing Sir Kier Hindsight’s vision for the future and how he intends to get us to this great Eutopia?

    Can you imagine the media if Boris had been found out to not be self isolating when the rules say he should’ve been?

    Maybe a day trip to Barnard Castle with Carrie and the baby is best.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by mickd1961 View Post
    The bloke can’t win whatever he does.

    People have been moaning about Cummings all year and even Spitting Image ( which is very funny on this one by the way ) has lampooned him and made it seem like Cummings could even eat baby Wilf and not get sacked ��

    I’m looking forward to hearing Sir Kier Hindsight’s vision for the future and how he intends to get us to this great Eutopia?

    Can you imagine the media if Boris had been found out to not be self isolating when the rules say he should’ve been?

    Maybe a day trip to Barnard Castle with Carrie and the baby is best.
    Personally, I wanted Cummings to stay. He was the only one with any backbone, there. Boris was elected to do one job, because that is all he's capable of. Not his fault, Covid, but if you surround yourself with lightweights to make yourself look good, then this is what you can expect

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,783
    Boris is told to ‘self isolate’ as he has been in contact with someone who has tested positive. Would he not be absolutely taken to task if he did not follow the current guidelines, just because he is England’s Prime Minister. That would simply be out of order.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    15,872
    Quote Originally Posted by mickd1961 View Post
    It’s convenient to change the size of the U.K. population to suit you’re narrative, the fact is that the population stood at 66.65 million as of 2019.

    I accept your figure was correct at 0.7%......too many zeros in my bad maths!

    You quote that 30 people from an average 25,000 Albion home crowd would’ve died from Covid but I’d contend that most of those would’ve died from something else over the same period.

    The median death rate for the last 10 months is up a chunk from last year but it’s nonsense to suggest all 25,000 in the crowd would’ve been immune to death if Covid didn’t exist.

    My point was more about the Boris self isolation aspect.

    If you think about this logically you could end up in almost permanent isolation.

    You do your two weeks and each time you complete it you’re unlucky enough to be in contact with someone who tests positive for it the very next day!

    I would’ve thought that by now some trials would’ve been done to see if people who have had Covid like Boris Can then still be a carrier having come into contact with someone testing positive?

    To me that’s not rocket science but a legitimate scientific test programme to set up.

    It’s not about me or others “knowing better” and the pomposity of others on here who are decrying “armchair doctors”.......I’m not for a minute saying that I do know better.

    Can’t disagree with anything here and I certainly agree with your previous posts - millions should be pumped into the NHS rather than chucking money down the drain.

    Personally sick of the economy closing down again as so many businesses will crash at the end of January. What about cancer treatments and operations constantly being stopped due to COVID and mental health issues will go through the roof. What about our younger generation?

    The majority of the deaths are those past retirement age so should many of the elderly or those at risk stay at home so the economy can keep moving and our NHS sort many out who really need operations and treatment? If not then these people should take their chances.

    PS - I am at risk so being careful and rarely go out. I do fear for the younger generation though and those going through mental depression as their businesses are failing due to no fault of their own!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,131
    Self taught expert mathematicians too maybe? 😎

    50 000 (dead) and 67 000 000 (inhabitants), that’s 0,00074627, 0,75 per mille.

    At us, 6 000 dead, 10 000 000 inhabitants, ca 0,0006, 0,6 per mille.

    And, don’t forget the important prepositions, WITH and (directly) OF. Our NHS and Public Health of Sweden have published a study where it’s stated that ca 15 % of our 6 000 have died directly of C 19. Since we are talking about human beings I imagine it’s roughly the same at yours, so ca 15 % out of ca 50 000 or ca 6 000, and you can do the maths again.

    I think that the pandemic should be taken seriously, and I have never believed it to be a conspiracy, or similar. What I do believe in is a measured, prudent and accurate approach with as little bad health in total (not just Corona then) as possible, for everyone in society. Draconian measures are not that in my opinion, I’m no medical expert, and have never claimed to be one. What I do see are ”so called medical experts on both sides claiming things with dead certaintity”, to make their point. Media is not very helpful there...

    Real medical experts are not united about the ”correct approach” - united about that it is a serious situation, yes, but about the best and correct measures, no.

    Quite a few medical experts, doctors and epidemiologists were interviewed recently over here. Some had ”Corona medical tunnel vision” and were screaming for tougher measures, others said, ”yes, I am an expert of medicine, but not on all bad things that come out of draconian measures, and we do know that they afflict bad health and death on people, so therefore we need to look at the whole situation and perspective, and have a measured approach”. I, myself, have so much more respect for the latter ones, than for the first that come across as omniscient and omnipotent, with often a grandeur personality.

    Instead of pointing fingers at ordinary people who make mistakes, which makes them human in my opinion, one should point fingers at those responible for NHS and care homes for the elderly without enough capacity.

    Germany, larger population than GB, some 80 million plus, have coped fairly well so far during the pandemic. Due to draconian measures, no, just take a look at their neighbour Belgium. Because of their high quality/capacity NHS.

    Sweden have 5 ICU beds per 100 000 people, Germany have 30... Says a lot, I guess (don’t know) GB are more like us than Germany.

    From day one I have been on about capacity, working conditions, stock, PPE, well trained and educated staff within the NHS and the care homes for the elderly, combined with measured and prudent, yes, measures.

    The pandemic also, unfortunately, gives the Stasi types a field day - NB, talking about examples in Sweden, not about things posted on here.

    Take care. 😊

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,783
    Hindsight is a wonderful thing! Keir Starmer is good at that too.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,131
    Quote Originally Posted by Baggiemadguern View Post
    Hindsight is a wonderful thing! Keir Starmer is good at that too.
    But, you get it all wrong, it’s not about hindsight, it’s about the opposite. Looking and planning forward for what may come - same with countries (like mine) that ”dismantled the military” when the Soviet Union ceased to exist, not a very bright idea.

    Keir Starmer - not a clue, new possible signing!? 😉

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •