+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Premier League player questioned over two more rape claims against a different woman

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    9,423
    Quote Originally Posted by Scum-Triumphant View Post
    Wonder if if happened at a North London club during their end of season Partey.
    If that’s a cryptic clue……..it’s a terrible one…🤣

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    28,843
    It's interesting that his club has not suspended him. Brave decision or not?

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/62158150

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    51,253
    Quote Originally Posted by CAMiller View Post
    It's interesting that his club has not suspended him. Brave decision or not?

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/62158150
    Just been reading the story on another site. Very brave or very stupid by his club. Either they know something to take such steps but, it appears they’re willing to run the wrath if he’s convicted.

    All ifs and buts…. It will all come out in the end.
    Biggest thing for me though is, IF he’s proven innocent does he have the right to have her charged for false allegations?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Just been reading the story on another site. Very brave or very stupid by his club. Either they know something to take such steps but, it appears they’re willing to run the wrath if he’s convicted.

    All ifs and buts…. It will all come out in the end.
    Biggest thing for me though is, IF he’s proven innocent does he have the right to have her charged for false allegations?
    But if he was named, more women might be emboldened to come forward?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    51,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    But if he was named, more women might be emboldened to come forward?
    That may all come out once it reaches court. The police can always arrest him again if anyone else comes forward once he attends court and is named. But flip the coin now. How about his name is all over the press/ media and he’s completely innocent?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    3,382
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Just been reading the story on another site. Very brave or very stupid by his club. Either they know something to take such steps but, it appears they’re willing to run the wrath if he’s convicted.

    All ifs and buts…. It will all come out in the end.
    Biggest thing for me though is, IF he’s proven innocent does he have the right to have her charged for false allegations?
    The thing is Brin, in our courts you get found not guilty. That isn't the same as being proven innocent. If you mean if he can categorically prove he is innocent (other end of country when it supposedly took place or something similar) then I suspect he may have a chance. But being found not guilty in court due to a lack of evidence wouldn't be enough. He would have to prove she was lying.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    4,924
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    But if he was named, more women might be emboldened to come forward?
    I believe that is correct Grist that if a complaint is made and the police find there is a case to answer, they then name the suspect to see if anyone else comes forward. UTM

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,385
    There is no statutory bar on the naming of suspects in criminal cases, but the police and media have stopped doing so since the BBC got a £210 000 bloody nose for breaching Cliff Richard's right to a private life when they filmed the police at his home and named him as a suspect in a ***ual offence case in 2014.

    The European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to a private life.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,385
    Quote Originally Posted by MillersTime View Post
    The thing is Brin, in our courts you get found not guilty. That isn't the same as being proven innocent. If you mean if he can categorically prove he is innocent (other end of country when it supposedly took place or something similar) then I suspect he may have a chance. But being found not guilty in court due to a lack of evidence wouldn't be enough. He would have to prove she was lying.
    Exactly so.

    The evidence in criminal cases is often limited. That is, perhaps, particularly so in rape cases where the complainant and suspect are often the only two direct witnesses to what occurred. What that means is that it will frequently be the case that a jury will conclude that is impossible to be sure who is telling the truth.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,385
    The. Scottish courts have three verdicts - 'guilty', 'not guilty' and 'not proven'.

    I'm not sure what the implications of the third verdict is for the defendant. It strikes me as being a tad unfair - a bit of a 'we're not sure you did it, but don't do it again' approach.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •