+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 192

Thread: McClean whinging again.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ericsladkilnhurst View Post
    McLean us a sh*thouse, full stop.
    He was good in Die Hard though

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    If he’s getting abuse at games then understandable it needs looking into but he needs to ****ing grow up and stop bringing it in on himself in some cases
    Also if he doesn’t want/agree with poopy or minute silence then I’ve no problem with him standing at side of pitch out of way but by no means turn your ****ing back and not expect a backlash
    Last edited by millertop; 18-10-2022 at 11:45 AM.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by howdydoo View Post
    Oh, for the good old days to return.

    If only, for a day.
    " any last requests?"

    Yes, did I tell you I'm a vegan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    477
    McLeans problem is not that he doesn't go along with all these things, poppies, queen etc, but that he actively makes a meal out of not doing so. He could just not do something, but he has to make a song and dance about it. And that's when it turns from quietly declining to join in with what others are doing, to making it known he isn't and turning it into a protest. And then he moans when he gets abused for actively making it known he is not joining in.

    Yes we get why you don't wear poppy, but there is a difference between just not wearing one and making a point of telling the whole world that you aren't. People might except it more if he didn't make a song and dance over it. If he quietly respected those that do, people might respect why he doesn't.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    51,356
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleSquirt View Post
    McLeans problem is not that he doesn't go along with all these things, poppies, queen etc, but that he actively makes a meal out of not doing so. He could just not do something, but he has to make a song and dance about it. And that's when it turns from quietly declining to join in with what others are doing, to making it known he isn't and turning it into a protest. And then he moans when he gets abused for actively making it known he is not joining in.

    Yes we get why you don't wear poppy, but there is a difference between just not wearing one and making a point of telling the whole world that you aren't. People might except it more if he didn't make a song and dance over it. If he quietly respected those that do, people might respect why he doesn't.
    LittleSquirt, very valid points you make there. Thing is he's the type never to try that because he wouldn't be getting his 15 minutes of annual fame.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleSquirt View Post
    McLeans problem is not that he doesn't go along with all these things, poppies, queen etc, but that he actively makes a meal out of not doing so. He could just not do something, but he has to make a song and dance about it. And that's when it turns from quietly declining to join in with what others are doing, to making it known he isn't and turning it into a protest. And then he moans when he gets abused for actively making it known he is not joining in.

    Yes we get why you don't wear poppy, but there is a difference between just not wearing one and making a point of telling the whole world that you aren't. People might except it more if he didn't make a song and dance over it. If he quietly respected those that do, people might respect why he doesn't.
    Sorry, but you've completely missed the point.

    You're saying he shouldn't protest if he doesn't want abuse.

    In a free society, why shouldn't he feel comfortable protesting if that's what he wants to say?

    That's not free speech.

    There is a big distinction between being disagreed with, and being subjected to abuse.

    People who don't really care about that distinction are at risk of turning us into the sort of country that the people who fought for this country were fighting against.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    Sorry, but you've completely missed the point.

    You're saying he shouldn't protest if he doesn't want abuse.

    In a free society, why shouldn't he feel comfortable protesting if that's what he wants to say?

    That's not free speech.

    There is a big distinction between being disagreed with, and being subjected to abuse.

    People who don't really care about that distinction are at risk of turning us into the sort of country that the people who fought for this country were fighting against.
    I'm not saying that at all. I have not said he shouldn't protest. But not agreeing does not have to be turned into a protest. He could quietly decline to be involved, and respect those that do want to. But he doesn't. He spoils that mark of respect others are making by drawing attention to himself.

    In your free speech world you are within your rights to talk loudly on your phone in the middle of a minutes silence in memory of someone you hated. But you can expect abuse for it for not respecting that other people do want to uphold that minute silence.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,987
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleSquirt View Post
    I'm not saying that at all. I have not said he shouldn't protest. But not agreeing does not have to be turned into a protest. He could quietly decline to be involved, and respect those that do want to. But he doesn't. He spoils that mark of respect others are making by drawing attention to himself.

    In your free speech world you are within your rights to talk loudly on your phone in the middle of a minutes silence in memory of someone you hated. But you can expect abuse for it for not respecting that other people do want to uphold that minute silence.
    This is a football message board NOT a party political platform.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,987
    Quote Originally Posted by MillerBill View Post
    This is a football message board NOT a party political platform.
    That was meant for John the politician not Squirt.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by MillerBill View Post
    This is a football message board NOT a party political platform.
    Who started this political thread?

    Why do you have a go at me but not them?

Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •