NCP had Vinny and JOB with the lowest marks of any of our players yesterday. Nonsense
https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport...ngs-vs-8333074
Anyone else agree that subs should be rated for what they do in the time they're allowed and not have their rating scaled back to a percentage of the whole?
Give a high mark, the same as a starter, and everyone knows it's as a sub, they can see the line-ups, they don't have to be marked down...
Sometimes subs get an ordinary lowish mark because they don't have time to show what they can do or have any impact. But with as much as 25-30 mins (with stoppage time) that isn't the case and I thought Vinny and JOB were both worth a 8 yesterday IMO
|
| + Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Results 11 to 12 of 12
Thread: Rating Subs
Threaded View
-
08-04-2023, 05:47 AM #1
Hall Of Fame
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 8,997
Rating Subs
Last edited by the_anticlough; 08-04-2023 at 05:52 AM.
Reply With QuoteForum Info
Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.
Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!
Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.
Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you
The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.
So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!
(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)
