Originally Posted by
thefulltenyards
As has been said by many it is both but for me as a split it's weighted more in the direction of the owners than the head coach.
The owners and how they run a football club is the single most important and key factor to a club being successful in my opinion. There are endless examples both positive and negative.
Would a head coach like LW have accepted the job offer if we were still well known in football as the boom and bust club lurching from one disaster to the next? And if he had would he have been as successful as he has been?
You can have success with a great manager or head coach with poor owners but it's usually very short lived, or a false dawn as we know all to well. Built on sand springs to mind from nearly 15 seasons ago.
The hiring of two basically unknowns who have both helped send the club in the right direction is not random luck.
The fans just had to be patience, and collectively football fans don't tend to be and as a fanbase we most definitely aren't. If you looked beyond the finishing league position or stage of the playoff exit it was quite clear the building blocks were being put in place year on year, the HMS Notts County had been turned around in the shallow but less choppy waters of the National League.
The owners have given the stability, sense of pride combined with progress many supporters were so desperate for. One thing they should never have been labelled, as they were, is lacking ambition.
As mentioned the blueprint is there for the next coach to implement. I just don't want the next coach to be any time soon as LW could hardly have done any better to date.