+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: The king is dead, long live the king

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,777
    Quote Originally Posted by tommopie8 View Post
    He's like a broken record except both sides are the same. Sure he'd never call for Notts to break a contract of a manager if they had lost 10 on the bounce...

    I personally would like the brothers to shelf their long term vision plans until May - use the compensation to attract someone of established calibre that has a presence on a short term deal incentivised by promotion.

    It's going to be a whole lot easier this season than without Langstaff and McGoldrick another year older.

    Who that is? I'm sure I don't know. I certainly won't qualm if it's an U23 coach making a step up or someone from lower down the pyramid. Just think there's still half a season and about 17 other teams would swap places with us in the league. Momentum is everything and if someone comes in and doesn't impress the players I can see this season fizzling out awfully quickly.
    A good call. Won’t ever happen, but the thought did occur to me with the idea of a Martin Allen type manager on a short term, get us hard to beat and keep collecting points.

    More likely to be a reserve coach who is promising etc…

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,014
    Quote Originally Posted by JoePass View Post
    If he signs a contract and sticks by it, he will get my vote.
    Does it work both ways? So even if we have a manager who fails we should keep him for the entire duration of his contact?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,936
    Some great research work here by Tom Williams on a few possible candidates:

    https://twitter.com/tomhwilliams23/s...06180783485363

    And re the manager honouring his contract, that’s the price we’re paying for success. It’s frustrating, but it’s still a better option than having to keep firing rubbish managers. The worry, of course, is that we got a rare gem in LW and may not be quite so lucky next time (he definitely had something to prove at Notts, which worked in both our favours).

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,729
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Does it work both ways? So even if we have a manager who fails we should keep him for the entire duration of his contact?
    Exactly I said this the other night but of course not.

    Get treble your money, move higher job and closer to home.....yeah loads would say no to that.

    Loyalty makes me laugh when that gets said as we know it doesnt really happen in footy !

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    8,530
    Quote Originally Posted by Old_pie View Post
    Think outside the box:

    The king is dead, long live the Queen.
    Even Paul Mace acknowledged (with a laugh) this possibility. Sarina Wiegman anyone?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,729
    Quote Originally Posted by Old_pie View Post
    Even Paul Mace acknowledged (with a laugh) this possibility. Sarina Wiegman anyone?
    Its a laugh for sure as she is probably on £1m a year at a guess !

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by Old_pie View Post
    Think outside the box:

    The king is dead, long live the Queen.
    Wheres the bloke darlin’ lol

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    12,225
    Quote Originally Posted by legs77 View Post
    Its a laugh for sure as she is probably on £1m a year at a guess !
    Very widely reported as £400K.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Does it work both ways? So even if we have a manager who fails we should keep him for the entire duration of his contact?
    I don't remember Soccerman complaining about not honouring contracts when we sacked Fullarton. Imagine having to put up with him for two years or whatever it was just because it was the decent thing to do!

    And didn't Hardy say he wanted to sign Harry Kewell on a five year deal?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    I don't remember Soccerman complaining about not honouring contracts when we sacked Fullarton. Imagine having to put up with him for two years or whatever it was just because it was the decent thing to do!

    And didn't Hardy say he wanted to sign Harry Kewell on a five year deal?
    Well cheers for those reminders Elite. The cat's crying now.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •