Why wasn't there the same outrage over Lucy Letby? Surely by the same logic used by rioters they should have been storming hospitals attacking innocent nurses? I dont recall musk or Farage being as vocal over her horrific offences?
|
| + Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Why wasn't there the same outrage over Lucy Letby? Surely by the same logic used by rioters they should have been storming hospitals attacking innocent nurses? I dont recall musk or Farage being as vocal over her horrific offences?
Good point, but probably, as I’m certain you’re aware, because there isn’t an agenda against nurses, where as there is against those of Muslim appearance or with the ‘wrong’ skin tone.
To suggest that there is no correlation between the Southport rioters/sympathisers and those of a racist disposition seems ludicrous to me.
I’d love anyone on here who defends the rioting in Southport and across the UK last summer to tell me what the rioters hoped to achieve other than the creation of more disharmony, misery and heartache.
P.S. Totally agree with MA’s comments above.
Last edited by ramAnag; 25-01-2025 at 01:00 PM.
It?s a bit daft to refer to ?anyone on here who defends the rioting? because there isn?t anyone is there? I don?t think even TTR does, so what?s your point?
Regarding the ?agenda? thing, you?re missing the point that the reason there were no ?anti-nurse riots? is that there isn?t a fundamental dislike of nurses whereas there is, whether justified or not, for Muslims . If Starmer?s speech earlier in the week aims to provide an impetus to address that issue, and the problems emanating from both/all sides of the issue, then all well and good, but the jury is out
Jeez. Which part of info held back to avoid having the trial called off and the lad walking free?
He 's a very disturbed lad. Severe mental issues. Should have been sectioned age ago. Only 2 weeks before the murders, his Dad stopped him going to his old school with a knife.
Under the current Law, which HMG has said it will change, terrorism is an act, in support of a religious or political ideology with the intent of overthrowing the powers that be.
This is a deranged lad, obsessed with murder and, I repeat, should have been sectioned long ago.
To a lot of people, this was a terrorist attack. The Law says otherwise. The Law will be changed to make this kind of attack seen as a terrorist attack.
The police, Starmer, the Court, all had their hands tied behind their backs by UK Law.
It''s a shame he couldn't be tried as a terrorist but the Law is the Law. That is being changed.
An even bigger shame is that the lad wasn't sectioned earlier.
Online there's all manner of lies still being peddled. Like his Dad was a Warlord. His dad was actually in the army of the smaller religious faction (Hutus or Tutsi, I forget which) and it was they who were victims of the genocide. He fled to the UK. His involvement in the fighting was to protect his tribe. Minds are being poisoned by lies.