It’s you that’s doing the raging
I’m just pointing and laughing.
So now you’re defending flashers.
It’ll be kiddie fiddlers next.
It’s you that’s doing the raging
I’m just pointing and laughing.
So now you’re defending flashers.
It’ll be kiddie fiddlers next.
If you follow the chronology it goes something like this
Jan 22 - charged as a man
Feb 22 - charged as a woman (presumably as he self-declared as such)
Mar 22 - charged as a man (so did he change his mind or forget to self-declare?)
Apr 22 - charged as a woman
I could understand if the first two were as a man and the second two as a woman, but to change and then change and then change again from month to month shows the flaws in self-declaration does it not???
No
In Mason’s world, biology doesn’t exist.
We can all be whatever we want to be by just wishing very hard.
Watch out for that fourth wish though because it all goes back to the start *
* Busy Lizzie ( picture book circa 1962)
It’s not that it doesn’t exist, it’s that I understand it. You keep typing away with your forehead though, it’s always fun
Point and laugh at the pervert lover.
Mason's world, weirdos only welcome.
It’s not that I love them, it’s that I’m indifferent. You should try it, might stop your head from exploding
Strange how anyone disagreeing with you, on any subject whatsoever, is deemed to be " angry"
Of course in Mason's imaginary world, everyone is happy all the time , pink is everyone's favourite colour and nothing can ever ever go wrong.
Being indifferent to perverts hasn't really worked out for the best in the past, perhaps you need to think again.
Last edited by donsdaft; 04-11-2022 at 05:29 PM.
Why are you so he'll bent on claiming anyone who differs from your black and white world view is a pervert? They are people, some may be perverted, many, many more are not. Many people who you would deem normal are perverts.
Why not try treating people like people, and as long as they're not c**ts just let them live their lives in a manner that makes then feel happy and themselves.
Biologies a bugger. Yeah, yeah, yeah - cock = mannie, fanny = wifie. But there is a difference between gender and ***. Yes, you have claimed in the past that this is a recent interpretation of the words, but that is just plain wrong. I do agree that someone born male cannot, and never will be able to, carry a child. However, I think you'll find nobody is trying to claim differently (apart from in your head) - queue the response that Mason would argue they can.
We are all born different. Saying we can only be one of two ways is falling into 'mannie in the sky' territory, or like believing there is no other 'intelligent' life in the universe (I do wonder how intelligentwe actually are). Despite your protestations to the contrary, you increasingly come across like a far right religious nut job.
Just try letting people live their lives and getting on with your own without letting other people's harmless lifestyles bother you. There are wrong-uns of all shapes and sizes, worry more about them than getting worked up about perfectly normal people who identify differently.
You know, not all "poofs and weirdos" fancy you and want to look at your willy, despite your apparent superior masculinity.
So, you're joining Mason's campaign in favour of exposing yourself in public.
I'm not stopping anyone, I'm just not joining in with the self deception.
Trying to make it illegal to call a mannie in a frock a mannie in a frock is patently absurd.
They're lifestyle isn't harmless when they put so much effort into forcing other people to share their ridiculous views.
Their not they're