Transfer Rumour Thread 21/22

[JamesMcClean]

He very well could be. I can only judge him on his most recent and that was with us. I was absolutely delighted when he signed because I remember the impact he had at Hibs, so I was equally massively disappointed that his spell with us was so poor. Not too mention the head down, kicking the ball away antics. Get on with it and show what a player you can be instead of being a huffy b*stard about it. Time will tell I guess.

Losing his pot belly for one would be a good start……………..

[Kdyteejay2]

He very well could be. I can only judge him on his most recent and that was with us. I was absolutely delighted when he signed because I remember the impact he had at Hibs, so I was equally massively disappointed that his spell with us was so poor. Not too mention the head down, kicking the ball away antics. Get on with it and show what a player you can be instead of being a huffy b*stard about it. Time will tell I guess.

McNulty was playing out of his favourite position all season. I would be looking for a greater contribution from him this season though. However it looks a lazy signing to me and not sure I’d be fussed if it didn’t happen.

[stokearab]

He very well could be. I can only judge him on his most recent and that was with us. I was absolutely delighted when he signed because I remember the impact he had at Hibs, so I was equally massively disappointed that his spell with us was so poor. Not too mention the head down, kicking the ball away antics. Get on with it and show what a player you can be instead of being a huffy b*stard about it. Time will tell I guess.

Yeah, this is the risk with McNulty. And it's a further risk to justify the signing by hoping he'll be a success if played at CF. There's zero evidence to support it.

Get a proper CF ffs

[Arabdownsouth]

Fair enough. Rumours it is. Hope they're correct as Clark isn't good enough at Premiership level. He's one of my 7 or 8 for offloading. But ragging folk up for not posting is argumentative. I've had a very busy week and never swerved a thread on here in my life.

Fair enough, but your post was also argumentative and you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet about me in particular. Other folk argue on here and you don't get involved, when it's me you're all over it like a rash. But it's cool, I've rubbed folk up the wrong way at times because my opinion is a bit left wing compared to the popular opinion so I can take it 😁

But let's put it to bed and move on shall we?

I actually think if Nicky Clark was regularly played up front he'd do absolutely fine at this level, but it rarely happens. It's no coincidence that he scored most of his goals while Shankland was out injured last season, and when he played in partnership with McNulty they gelled very well if I remember correctly. Personally would have no problem with that partnership again but we also need to bring in a third striker in my opinion

[Arabdownsouth]

Also with McNulty if Hibs aren't in for him he cannae be any good surely 😁😁😁

They will probably come in for Shankland instead 😂😂

[tHeArAb]

Losing his pot belly for one would be a good start……………..

He also needs the supply. If we don't deal with that side of things then it's an almost pointless signing.

[tHeArAb]

Also with McNulty if Hibs aren't in for him he cannae be any good surely 😁😁😁

If Hibs aren't in for him, are we even in for him? 😂

[A. J]

According to Scott Burns twitter, usually the most reliable source, we've signed the left winger that people have been screaming out for, subject to him getting a work permit.

I am just curious why this thread is so inactive is all, or rather inactive with on topic discussion I should say. Plenty of page after page discussion about every possible negative view up until now though. I don't think I'm stirring the pot or anything in making a point of this.

This isn't directed at you incidentally, just a general observation.

My general observation is the rationale behind your attacks on posters who raise concerns, belong in the same box as Tam's post match media interviews.

You may huff and take a few mins to work out whether you should reply, but deep down I know you will struggle to resist scratching the itch to get the last word on this, thus I look forward to how you manage to untangle and fully justify how my observation is incorrect.

I'm laying odds on that our happy clappy chappy gets snappy

[stokearab]

Fair enough, but your post was also argumentative and you do seem to have a bee in your bonnet about me in particular. Other folk argue on here and you don't get involved, when it's me you're all over it like a rash. But it's cool, I've rubbed folk up the wrong way at times because my opinion is a bit left wing compared to the popular opinion so I can take it 😁

But let's put it to bed and move on shall we?

I actually think if Nicky Clark was regularly played up front he'd do absolutely fine at this level, but it rarely happens. It's no coincidence that he scored most of his goals while Shankland was out injured last season, and when he played in partnership with McNulty they gelled very well if I remember correctly. Personally would have no problem with that partnership again but we also need to bring in a third striker in my opinion

I think where I fell out with you was when you were slagging folk off as doom predictors for posting serious concerns about the club.
You seem to want everyone to post positivity all the time. That's not going to happen.

I'm sure there's plenty posters on here who don't like my posting style, and that's fair enough because I don't like yours.

But we're all Arabs, we all love the club and we all want the best for the club, so as you say let's leave it there and move on.

[stokearab]

They will probably come in for Shankland instead 😂😂

Actually that would not surprise me one bit. More likely to Hibs than Hearts I would have thought.