Election Year or Fear!

[swaledale]

It looks very like the good old "they're asking for it, ****ty white trash" defence to me?

Which if one actually reads the reports into the failure to respond and tackle these grooming cases, the main reason was that the Police and authorities took the view that these girls were asking for it, were beneath contempt and consequently took little notice of their complaints or gave up when the victims went back to the abusers.

The same attitude can be seen in the failure of the Glasgow rapist, the Police were not motivated to act on complaints because she was a *** worker.

[Trickytreesreds]

Election year madness continues . Good old SNP hilarity never ends

The Scottish Govermment document says it would have a seat at the table at the UN, join the EU and be a full member of the Nato military alliance, while also removing nuclear weapons from the country.

https://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...ndence-4540930

[Trickytreesreds]

Which if one actually reads the reports into the failure to respond and tackle these grooming cases, the main reason was that the Police and authorities took the view that these girls were asking for it, were beneath contempt and consequently took little notice of their complaints or gave up when the victims went back to the abusers.

The same attitude can be seen in the failure of the Glasgow rapist, the Police were not motivated to act on complaints because she was a *** worker.

Yes they did. But the question remains why?
1. It was hot potato of race rumbles, they didn't want to deal with
2. The girls being blamed was easier
2. The people complicit in the abuse spread far and wide, which was a road they didn't want to go down. Yep, local councillors were either involved, or part of the cover up.

The whole episode is a blight on British justice and shameful, in the name of multiculturalism and not rocking the boat.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlCC...channel=GBNews

[MadAmster]

Election year madness continues . Good old SNP hilarity never ends

The Scottish Govermment document says it would have a seat at the table at the UN, join the EU and be a full member of the Nato military alliance, while also removing nuclear weapons from the country.

https://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...ndence-4540930

An independent Scotland would, possibly not immediately but certainly would, have a seat at the UN, would join the EU, be a full member of NATO and would get the Westminster government to house their nuclear weapons outside of Scotland.

[Trickytreesreds]

An independent Scotland would, possibly not immediately but certainly would, have a seat at the UN, would join the EU, be a full member of NATO and would get the Westminster government to house their nuclear weapons outside of Scotland.

wow, really? You seem cetain there Maddy.
1. They have a massive way to go to join the EU, as they fail meet its requirements and have to get every member to vote yes
2. NATO, is exactly the same, New members must be invited by a consensus of current members.

Decisions to invite new members must take into account the required ratification process in the member states.
3. Nuclear weapons, move them and who is to say the UK is not going to disband every military station it can as a result?

This is chest beating desperation without explaining the difficulties involved and its implications, such as jobs at bases and ship yards .
Which is normal SNP bull****.
Paint a pretty picture and ignore the mess.

[ramAnag]

I see that the Trump campaign is now producing a number of faked ‘photos’ of their hero in the company of African Americans in order to try and win the support of the ‘black vote’.
People really are going to have to take care to separate the fact from the deep fake on both sides of the Atlantic this time around.

[MadAmster]

wow, really? You seem cetain there Maddy.
1. They have a massive way to go to join the EU, as they fail meet its requirements and have to get every member to vote yes
2. NATO, is exactly the same, New members must be invited by a consensus of current members.

Decisions to invite new members must take into account the required ratification process in the member states.
3. Nuclear weapons, move them and who is to say the UK is not going to disband every military station it can as a result?

This is chest beating desperation without explaining the difficulties involved and its implications, such as jobs at bases and ship yards .
Which is normal SNP bull****.
Paint a pretty picture and ignore the mess.

What stations and where?

An independent Scotland would be perfectly well within their rights to tell Westminster to house UK nukes in the UK. I presume any new Scottish government would keep the various Scots regiments, they would not be disbanding all bases. Part of any "divorce" agreement would be the splitting up of assets and liabilities. Scotland has 8% of the UK populace so they'd be entitled to 8% of the Air Force planes, Navy ships, Army weapons etc. They'd also be entitled to 8% of the nuclear arsenal although they'll probably decline that.

EU. Wouldn't get a shoe in but many EU states have already said they'd welcome an independent Scotland. NATO? Again it wouldn't be a shoe in but they would join. Scots regiments are legendary fighters.

[Andy_Faber]

EU. Wouldn't get a shoe in but many EU states have already said they'd welcome an independent Scotland.

But Spain haven’t and won’t because it sets a precedent for Catalonia

[MadAmster]

But Spain haven’t and won’t because it sets a precedent for Catalonia

Only a precedent if Catalonia legally gains independence.

[Andy_Faber]

Only a precedent if Catalonia legally gains independence.

QED Catalonia has no legal means, neither does Scotland