Transfer Rumour Thread 21/22

[AraBrian]

I'm struggling to understand how that can be the case though given third party ownership is banned by FIFA and has been since 2015 or whenever. Or am I missing something?

This all day long unless we are breaking FiFa rules and think we will hear soon enough if we are personally think it is just mischief making.

[TerryTheTerror]

I'm struggling to understand how that can be the case though given third party ownership is banned by FIFA and has been since 2015 or whenever. Or am I missing something?

I actually agree with you, it seems highly unlikely. I just thought it was interesting the way he talked about the interest in Fuchs and Robson was quite different. Of course it could be we just haven't had any actual offers for Fuchs but have for Robson

[AraBrian]

I actually agree with you, it seems highly unlikely. I just thought it was interesting the way he talked about the interest in Fuchs and Robson was quite different. Of course it could be we just haven't had any actual offers for Fuchs but have for Robson

All he says is fuchs is going to attract a lot of attention in his last year of contract same as any player of his ability would and no one has met utd's valuation of robson.Can't see how you think that implys fuchs is not contracted to us?

[Shedboy1971]

I actually agree with you, it seems highly unlikely. I just thought it was interesting the way he talked about the interest in Fuchs and Robson was quite different. Of course it could be we just haven't had any actual offers for Fuchs but have for Robson

Cant see it tbh. Saw the pics of hime signing contract at tanny ok didnt see if it said united or revolution but pretty well known to all clubs the legalities. I cant believe we would try to flaunt this. However, 3rd parties can pay some or all of a players wages (dundee have 3 such players) i believe now maybe then there is a loan aspect? Only worry inhave here is if we have tried to be clever about this and bend the rules as it always ends in disaster. So all a bit weird but i do think fuchs will be off if a good bid comes in now. Robson has had 2 bids rejected and fvck knows why there has been no interest in siegriest.

[AraBrian]

Cant see it tbh. Saw the pics of hime signing contract at tanny ok didnt see if it said united or revolution but pretty well known to all clubs the legalities. I cant believe we would try to flaunt this. However, 3rd parties can pay some or all of a players wages (dundee have 3 such players) i believe now maybe then there is a loan aspect? Only worry inhave here is if we have tried to be clever about this and bend the rules as it always ends in disaster. So all a bit weird but i do think fuchs will be off if a good bid comes in now. Robson has had 2 bids rejected and fvck knows why there has been no interest in siegriest.

The good thing if it is true that he is not our player and belongs to revolution and has a contract to play for us until end of season only then no matter what size of a bid comes in for him we could turn down millions as we not get anything anyway so he is definitly here for rest of season Have to say again though think it's a lot of crap.Those players who are getting their wages paid from outside the club at dundee are still dundee players and do not belong to people who are paying their wage if dundee could sell them on they would get the money they sold them for.

[Shedboy1971]

The good thing if it is true that he is not our player and belongs to revolution and has a contract to play for us until end of season only then no matter what size of a bid comes in for him we could turn down millions as we not get anything anyway so he is definitly here for rest of season Have to say again though think it's a lot of crap.Those players who are getting their wages paid from outside the club at dundee are still dundee players and do not belong to people who are paying their wage if dundee could sell them on they would get the money they sold them for.

One is charlie adam so that wont be an issue with sell on as this is prob his last season anyway.

[shed_boy_21]

Cant see it tbh. Saw the pics of hime signing contract at tanny ok didnt see if it said united or revolution but pretty well known to all clubs the legalities. I cant believe we would try to flaunt this. However, 3rd parties can pay some or all of a players wages (dundee have 3 such players) i believe now maybe then there is a loan aspect? Only worry inhave here is if we have tried to be clever about this and bend the rules as it always ends in disaster. So all a bit weird but i do think fuchs will be off if a good bid comes in now. Robson has had 2 bids rejected and fvck knows why there has been no interest in siegriest.

Perhaps there's a separate contract between United and Revolution Sports? Perhaps RS are paying his wages and are therefore entitled to any sell on fee?

Either way, when he does leave, expect to be announced as either undisclosed or on a free!

[Shedboy1971]

Perhaps there's a separate contract between United and Revolution Sports? Perhaps RS are paying his wages and are therefore entitled to any sell on fee?

Either way, when he does leave, expect to be announced as either undisclosed or on a free!

Think rules are clear united must own him but well if paid by separate individual or company there may well be some agreement. Aye agree will be non disclosed. I still find the ability for others to pay wages fine but then to have a legal agreement above any loan on sale percentage above what has been loaned is a legal minefield i hope we arent playing with.

[BackRowArab]

Perhaps there's a separate contract between United and Revolution Sports? Perhaps RS are paying his wages and are therefore entitled to any sell on fee?

Either way, when he does leave, expect to be announced as either undisclosed or on a free!

United never disclose transfer fees

[AraBrian]

Perhaps there's a separate contract between United and Revolution Sports? Perhaps RS are paying his wages and are therefore entitled to any sell on fee?

Either way, when he does leave, expect to be announced as either undisclosed or on a free!

So you think revolution sports own his contract and pay his wages and he just turns out for utd for two years then moves on to a new club and they do the same again if they can't sell him if they can sell him they get 60% and his ex team get 40% pity this is not true would be a great way for utd to do business should get whole team through them 30 or so players and would not have to pay a penny